Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The Simpsons (season 7)

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 22:33, 22 March 2008.

The Simpsons (season 7)

Another season of The Simpsons, and I think this one is considerably better than the other Simpsons season FLs because it is more in depth and includes a section of DVD info (if anyone doesn't like it, please say so because I plan on adding similar sections to the rest of the season pages). Anyway, review away and I'll do my best to address concerns. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 15:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Matthew

Comments

Perhaps include more of a description of the show in the lead, explaining that it's an animated series, American, broadcast in America on Fox, etc.
- Done
"The show runners for the fourth production season were Bill Oakley and Josh Weinstein who would executive produce 21 episodes this season" Surely the seventh production season?
- D'oh!
"David Mirkin produced the remaining four, including two hold overs from the previous season" produced or exec produced?
- It's executive produced, I left the word "executive" out because it was used in the sentence before, but I readded it. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 19:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
the word "on" needed between "Region 1" and the date.
- Done
spelling: "charcter", there might be others but I didn't notice any
- Done
"turns himself in, but it turns that he didn't." a little clumsy, and perhaps missing a word?
- Done

That's it for now but I'd just like to add that I much prefer this format to the previous format of The Simpsons season pages, and as far as consistency throughout all the TV series' season pages, switching to this style is in my eyes, a good move. -- Matthew

Support Well done. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 21:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I can't find any legend or text explaining the episode numbers (for example, "131 - 3") and Prod. codes (for example "2F20"). Are readers supposed to know what these numbers mean? (FWIW, I've expressed as similar concern at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/voting/200804 regarding List of The Simpsons episodes.) --Orlady (talk) 17:51, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The first number is the series #, the second is the season # and I'm entirely sure that a reliable source exists that explains the production code. In 2F20, 2F is the production run number, the second number (20) is the order the episode was produced, so it would the 20th episode of the 2F production code. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 17:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - I found the "production code" explained at the alt.tv.simpsons FAQ (search on "code" to find the relevant FAQs). In my humble opinion, if the production code is encyclopedic information that needs to be included in these lists, the lists should have a legend with a reliably sourced explanation of the code. --Orlady (talk) 21:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Unfortunately, The Simpsons Archive usually isn't considered useable as a RS. We're allowed to link to it, but not use it for citations. Luckily, the codes are mentioned in Planet Simpson, so I used that. I added a key at the top of the list. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 22:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - Thanks for adding the key (and the supporting source). --Orlady (talk) 17:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved stuff from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Avoid links in the bold part of the lead per WP:LEAD#Bold title Done
"two hold overs"? What's a hold over? If I have to ask, it needs explanation. Done
"a Marge-shaped head " - do you mean a Marge head shaped box? Done
"They also wanted the Treehouse of Horror episode" - they wanted the episode? Doesn't sound right... Done
Treehouse of Horror VI is linked twice in the same section. Done
Why is Golf capitalised? Done
Link IRS for non-US readers. Done
Who's Jim Lau and why hasn't he got even a stub?
- I'm not sure, according to IMDB, he has been in dozens of things (although they were all small roles)
en-dash should be used in page ranges in citations. Done
"...the overall theme is a Celebrity Theme." - what does this mean? Done

All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 15:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - all my concerns have been well addressed. Nice list. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - My concerns have been addressed. --Orlady (talk) 17:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.