Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Taio Cruz discography/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 10:02, 6 May 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Taio Cruz discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 17:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because having extensively developed the tables and prose, I believe it now meets the FLC standard. (And now this my only open nomination.) I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 17:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. The leading section does not follow any logical order. It jumps from a single to an album and back. It is difficult to understand. In addition, please, count the number of "also"s in the leading section. It is an obvious example of "also abuse". Ruslik_Zero 18:21, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Performed a copyedit - removed three of the "also"s, and tried to make the order and flow of the lead more logical. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 21:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
;Comments Support
- The first paragraph in the lead should be broken up (perhaps separated by album releases).
- "contained five singles which all reached the top" → all of which
- Wiki-link Ludacris in the lead.
- In the live album and EP section: Formats → format
- Citations should be added to all claims in the Notes section
– Underneath-it-All (talk) 22:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:45, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Avoid blank cells in tables, if there's nothing to say, perhaps add an en-dash.
- This seems somewhat unnecessary - if there's nothing to say, why add anything? Yes, we put en-dashes in the chart position cells, but that's more a matter of neatness than anything as tables would just be full of tiny empty blank boxes - the certification cells are much bigger, so adding a dash hardly makes any difference. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 10:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man (talk) 18:13, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, not a big deal, but neatness applies throughout, not just the chart positions. The Rambling Man (talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.