Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Supergrass discography
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:Matthewedwards 19:38, 28 October 2008 [1].
previous FLC (21:11, 15 June 2008)
3rd nomination. I now think this meets featured list criteria. Just received a peer review (here) and issues have been addressed there. TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 03:45, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "twenty five" etc. should be "twenty-five"
- Some of the references are strangely formatted, like ""Moving" music video at Maguffin." (and missing a double-quotes)
- What do you mean? I see the "moving" ref as "Moving" music video at Maguffin. What's wrong with this? TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 06:37, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gary King (talk) 06:11, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from JD554 (talk · contribs)
- The album reached number one in the UK, where it stayed for three weeks.[1]: The reference (British Book of Hit Singles & Albums again) doesn't provide the number of weeks at a certain position, just the total number of weeks on chart. Should this reference be after the comma or is it a total of three weeks on the chart (in which case the sentence needs rewording)?
- This should have gone after the comma. I removed "where it stayed for three weeks" beacuse I can't find a reliable source for this. TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 06:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "Oracle" shouldn't be wikilink to a dab page.
- UK albums chart → UK Albums Chart, and wikilink first mention
- Done TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 14:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There are still some instances of lower case "albums chart". --JD554 (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What's the difference between 12" vinyl and LP?
- According to this, the difference is the revolutions per minute. It says the time duration for an LP is 45 minutes. I Should Coco is 43 minutes. So I guess that isn't an LP. TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 18:41, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- LP album says 45 minutes was the original maximum time, but neither article is cited on this point. As far as I'm aware there is no official length of time for an LP and only being two minutes under that wouldn't stop it being one. I'd suggest replacing 12" vinyl and replacing with LP. --JD554 (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I have replaced 12" vinyl with LP. TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 16:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- LP album says 45 minutes was the original maximum time, but neither article is cited on this point. As far as I'm aware there is no official length of time for an LP and only being two minutes under that wouldn't stop it being one. I'd suggest replacing 12" vinyl and replacing with LP. --JD554 (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Formats should be singular if there is only one.
- Can you explain more on this please? TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 06:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- For Live from London you have "formats" but then list only one (Digital download) --JD554 (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The British Book of Hit Singles & Albums reference cannot be used for Diamond Hoo Ha, "Fin", "Bad Blood" and "Rebel in You" as they are not included in the book due to it being published before they were released. Also the book only lists the Top 75. Therefore those chart positions are uncited.
- I've added citations for Diamond Hoo Ha, "Fin", "Bad Blood". TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 14:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Might be better to remove the unverifiable chart position. --JD554 (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. I can't find a source for where "Rebel in You" charted. TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 18:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Might be better to remove the unverifiable chart position. --JD554 (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Soundtrack songs should only be listed if they weren't previously available.
- I'm unsure about "Oracle". I think it may have been a b-side and not done especially for Mike Bassett: England Manager soundtrack. I have removed it until I find out whether it was available before the film. TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 18:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support: All my concerns have been addressed. --JD554 (talk) 20:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Looks good, from a peremptory visit. Tony (talk) 02:59, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- Ref #15 needs to be filled out.
- There are a number of sources of questionable reliability, but none of the information seems to be very controversial.
–Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. It's gone a bit quiet here. I've sorted the problems listed above. Anything else? TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 12:53, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, patience :) From WP:FLC: FL candidates will remain on this page for at least 10 days. --JD554 (talk) 13:56, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Certifications are awarded for units shippednot units sold, i\so its inappropriate to list 60000+ sales for a Silver album. So remove that sales column, and move the first album worldwide sales to the certification column itself (to save space). indopug (talk) 16:14, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I agree, you could remove the sales column on the singles table and put a bookmark or an aditional note for the only single certified. Jaespinoza (talk) 04:39, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.