Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Screaming Trees discography

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 06:57, 13 August 2008 [1].

---

Screaming Trees discography

Nominating it again :). --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 16:08, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

See previous FLC (06:53, 23 July 2008)

• Comments - a few openers.
  • As I pointed out several times before, the Tripwires linked to in the caption is a UK band. Is that correct? And don't just delete the caption either, if it's not. (YES, HE TOURED WITH THE BAND)
    • Sorry, don't believe it - the Tripwires article says the band are UK based, not Seattle based... Done The Rambling Man (talk) 19:00, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Caption is fragment so remove the full stop. Done
  • 8 (or more) uses of [1] in the lead? Really over the top. Done
  • Why isn't the compilation albums section called "Compilation albums"? Done
  • Some albums have release dates, some don't. Be consistent.' Done
  • The Zobbel links aren't correctly titled. Done
    •  Not done The Rambling Man (talk) 19:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
    •  Done --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 19:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • The Chart stats link "publisher" has "1 - 70" - why? Done
  • What were the contributions to the "Other appearances"? Done
    • Not referenced by [11]. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
      • The song(s) are not referenced by (now) [9] at all. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
      •  Done --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 19:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • What is "especific."? Done
• The Rambling Man (talk) 18:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

• Comments II
  • http://home.comcast.net/~othastar/WhatsNew.html is not a WP:RS.
  • Nor is http://www.director-file.com/amv/archive3.html.
• The Rambling Man (talk) 19:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

 Done --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 19:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

• Support Nice. Cannibaloki 14:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. :) --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 16:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Something else Rambling Man. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 14:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Comments

• I did a bit of a c/e on the Lede
• What makes Zobbel.de a WP:RS? There are better, more reliable sites for UK chart statsTHEY USE THE UK CHART BOOK AS A SOURCE
  • Then why don't you use the same chart book? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 21:09, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
• What makes clipland.com a WP:RS? Firefox blocked two pop-ups for me which I'm pleased about, but because it has pop ups, it shouldn't be used. I suspect it's only being used to reference the directors but because I also have YouTube blocked, and the clip is taken from YouTube (which also doesn't meet WP:RS) I can't watch it to find out. IS RELIABLE
  • According to who? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 21:09, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
• What makes CKB a RS? Looks like a fansite to me. NOT A FANSITE
  • I said it looks like one. It may not be one, but who is the publisher if it is Reliable?

I have far too many referencing issues so I Oppose Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

I have decided to take the three pages to WP:RSN, along with one other. You can find the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive_63#Query about four websites. If it comes back that they are Reliable I will change my oppose !vote. Right now I stand by it. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 21:09, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Comments

• Music videos this with tons of references taken from fansites.
  • Fansite = non-reliable source.

Cannibaloki 16:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

• My reference concerns have been addressed. I now support this list. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 00:10, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.