Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Ralph Bakshi filmography/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Rambo's Revenge 12:07, 9 July 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): Ibaranoff24 (talk) 00:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Featured list candidates/Ralph Bakshi filmography/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Ralph Bakshi filmography/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
This filmography was significantly improved during its last FLC. The current revision should address any remaining concerns of the FLC. Ibaranoff24 (talk) 00:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Truco (talk · contribs)
-
- General
- I reviewed and supported this FLC in the past, but I have a few things to say.
- Dabs, external links check out fine.
- Lead
- The lead lacks now that I really see it, this lead can be expanded greatly. Take Gene Kelly filmography as an example.
- I took a look at that page and rewrote the lead. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 21:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]
- I also find this (Listed here is the entirety of Bakshi's credited work as an animator, director, writer or producer.) unnecessary.--Truco 503 02:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Removed. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 21:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Comment My concerns were resolved last FLC, but I'd like to see if any other reviewers have suggestions before I support. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could this not be merged into the main article seeing as it is not that long and it would put everything together (i.e. the lead here will repeat stuff stated in that article). I realise there are FAC ambitions for the Ralph Bakshi article, so I've asked there too. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 23:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it could be merged. The main article is not that long, and there are only two tables that are not overwhelmingly large. As Rambo said, nothing in the lead would need to be merged as it would have been said in other parts of the main article. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:18, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I was planning on holding my tongue on this issue until I heard some more opinions, but I changed my mind considering that, including myself, there are three editors who feel that the articles could be merged, so I did just that. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 06:26, 9 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Since nominator has turned the list into a redirect after the above discussion I'm going to withdraw this nomination. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 12:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.