Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Quentin Tarantino filmography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Quentin Tarantino filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): FrB.TG (talk) 16:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Tarantino is hands down one of the best modern film directors (alongside Nolan, Spielberg and Scorsese); his films are often characterized by gore, violence, nonlinear storyline, and pop culture references. His most popular and successful films include Pulp Fiction (1994), Kill Bill (2004-05), Inglorious Basterds (2009) and Django Unchained (2012). This is my first filmography on a filmmaker and my first filmography since last August. I reckon it is close to meeting the six criteria. FrB.TG (talk) 16:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Yashthepunisher
- There is a typo in the caption of the third Image.
- Good catch!
- I'd suggest you to trim the 'promoting H 8' bit from the caption, its too long.
- A comma is missing from the first alt text.
- "..Sin City (2005) is not count." I think it should be "counted" instead, maybe.
- You got me there!
- My Best Friend's Birthday was a short film, that should be mentioned.
- Is it 'jewelry' or 'Jewellery'?
- They're both, but the former is American English.
- "His screenplay in Tony Scott's.." --> His screenplay for.
- Do we need to mention that he appeared briefly in Pulp?
- Kill Bill's plot detail is too much for a filmography, try trimming it down.
- I guess he directed one of the stories in Sin City not a scene.
- Not according to the source – it says, "Tarantino because he directed one brief scene"
Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good work! Yashthepunisher (talk) 09:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Yash. FrB.TG (talk) 14:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Pavanjandhyala
- "The film earned Tarantino an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay and a Best Director nomination, and is cited in the media as a defining film of the modern cinema." -- This line IMHO should be the other way around. Like: "Cited in the media as a defining film of the modern cinema, Pulp Fiction earned Tarantino an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay and a Best Director nomination." BTW, is it just American cinema or global cinema?
- "Also in 1994, he served as an executive producer in Killing Zoe..." -- i think "for" is better than "in" in this case.
- "which reached cult status and spawned several sequels" -- how about "attained cult status"?
- "The latter, a two-part martial arts film (Volume 1 and Volume 2), follows a former assassin, seeking revenge on her ex-colleagues who attempted to kill her." -- This line requires reliable sourcing.
- "he directed the segment, titled Death Proof." -- I suggest you to either remove the comma, or change "the segment" to "a segment". Any one change you like.
- Changed to "the segment Death Proof". Better this way, I think.
- In the case of Inglorious Basterds, a film is written first and directed next.
- "His greatest commercial success came with the 2012 western film Django Unchained" -- I suggest you to rephrase it as "The 2012 western film Django unchained was Tarantino's greatest commercial success".
- In this case I somehow find the former sentence more interesting.
- Ref no. 12 is redirecting. Please fix it.
- All the images used have no licensing issues with proper alt text.
Let me know once you are done. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Pavanjandhyala, thanks a lot for responding so quickly to my request and making the pertinent comments. FrB.TG (talk) 11:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good work. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Pavan and Yash have got most of the comments out of the way, so I found no issues with this when I read through it. Good work. JAGUAR 14:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you! FrB.TG (talk) 17:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Source Review
- Formatting: pass
- Spotchecks: checked refs 3, 20, 30, 37, all clear
- Completeness: pass
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 20:28, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.