Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Prince of Wales Trophy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 10+ days, 4 supports (including the nominator, as directed in the box at the top of FLC), 0 opposes. Promote. Daniel 04:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Completing nom started by Hasek is the best on 00:03, 20 September 2007
- Would it be possible to fatten the lead up a bit, maybe a sentence or two? It seems to be a bit small. Maxim(talk) 21:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeLead is poorly written, has grammar errors and fail to state when the trophy was instated. Also, the list has information that is only available via color, a big accessibility concern.Circeus 06:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]- I've expanded the lead, I think it's a bit better now. But the colour isn't such a big deal? It only uses one colour. Maxim(talk) 14:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes it is. Anybody who can't see the color for whatever reason (e.g. blind people with screen/braille readers, strange or unusual screen settings etc.) will not be able to know which team are applied the color, or possibly even that there is a color at all. Color should ideally only be used as a visual addendum to existing information. Circeus 17:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replaced everything denoted by color with †, sorry for the delay. :( Howzit now? Maxim(talk) 20:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- For the record, the colors don'thave to be removed, but if they are used to present useful information, they shouldn't be used alone. Given the number of note symbols, you might as well use a "note" column. Circeus 22:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Replaced everything denoted by color with †, sorry for the delay. :( Howzit now? Maxim(talk) 20:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes it is. Anybody who can't see the color for whatever reason (e.g. blind people with screen/braille readers, strange or unusual screen settings etc.) will not be able to know which team are applied the color, or possibly even that there is a color at all. Color should ideally only be used as a visual addendum to existing information. Circeus 17:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I've expanded the lead, I think it's a bit better now. But the colour isn't such a big deal? It only uses one colour. Maxim(talk) 14:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Circeus 22:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Since I'm only a caretaker around , Hasek is the best gets the nominator support !vote right? Maxim(talk) 22:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, though I am not entirely certain it is useful to note when the Canadiens set the record for most wins, or most consecutive wins. Resolute 01:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]