Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Peter Capaldi filmography/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Peter Capaldi filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC), Rusted AutoParts[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I have sourced the contents of the page. This would be part of a FT around Capaldi. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]- "His first acting role was in a 1974 play titled An Inspector Calls" - that implies that the play was written or first staged in 1974, which isn't correct. I would suggest "His first acting role was in a 1974 performance of the play An Inspector Calls" Done
- "Living Apart Together" should be in italics, also it would be good to say if it was a TV show or a film as "onscreen appearance" is vague Done
- "He portrayed the twelfth incarnation of the Doctor in Doctor Who (2013–2017) and Malcolm Tucker in The Thick of It (2005–2012)" - I would say it would make more sense to put these in chronological order Done
- "voice acting including, Rabbit" - no reason for that comma Done
- "Chrisopher Robin (2018)" - this is spelt incorrectly, also it should be in italics Done
- "He preformed as Professor Marcus in The Ladykillers." - "performed" is spelt wrong, also title should be in italics, also what was this? Another radio play? Done
- In the tables, roles should sort based on surname where the character had one Done
- Any title starting with "the" should sort based on the next word Done
- "Denotes works that have not yet been released"
- there don't seem to be any so just lose this Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding
!scope=col
to each header cell, e.g.! Yearbecomes!scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use!scope=colgroup
instead. Done - Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding
!scope=row
to each primary cell, e.g.| 1982becomes!scope=row | 1982(on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use!scope=rowgroup
instead. Done - Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. Done
--PresN 20:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image review from Dylan620
[edit]There's only one image, but I still figured an image review would be beneficial.
- Alt text should probably be added. Maybe something to indicate that it's a headshot of Capaldi?
- Encyclopedic value is obvious, as the image provides identification of Capaldi.
- Sourcing for the image checks out.
- The image is appropriately licensed under Creative Commons.
Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 23:03, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dylan620: added alt text. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you OlifanofmrTennant, looks good to me now. Support. Dylan620 in public/on mobile (he/him • talk) 08:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey man im josh
[edit]Source review: Passed
- Reliable enough for the information being cited
- Consistent date formatting
- Consistent and proper reference formatting
- Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
- Spot checks on 20 sources match what they are being cited for
Feedback:
- Refs 7, 38, 120 – Shift the title from all caps to title case Done
- Refs 13, 14, 17, 24, 27 – Change TVGuide to TV Guide instead (consistency with other refs / matches target)Done
- Ref 40 – Add publish date Done
- Ref 43 – Fix author name, it's Eleanor Bley Griffiths, not Eleanor Griffiths Bley Done
- Refs 43, 44, 80, 130 – These targets are redirects to another target, which is actually live, but the URL used should be updated to not be a redirect Done
- Refs 49, 88, 163 – Source is dead, mark it as such Done
- Ref 51 – Add author Done
- Ref 53, 59, 64, 79, 114, 115, 156, 158 – I believe these should be BBC Genome Project instead of BBC Genome Done
- Ref 75 – Wikilink to The Daily Telegraph for consistency with refs 117 and 152 Done
- Ref 82 – Uses a generally unreliable source, can we sub this out for another ref instead? Done
- Ref 85 – Wikilink The Observer and add author Done
- Ref 92 – Wikilink The Guardian Done
- Ref 110 – Add publish date Done
- Ref 129 – Change from Doctor Who TV to BBC Done
- Ref 140 – Add publish date and author Done
- Ref 146 – Change WhatsOnStage -> WhatsOnStage.com Done
- Ref 152 – Add author Done
- Ref 170 – Currently displaying an errorDone
- For the television table, change the abbreviation to "Refs." and the hover to "References", to reflect that there's more than one reference in the column for some of these Done
That's what I've got for now, please ping me when the above issues have been addressed. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Rusted AutoParts, @OlifanofmrTennant: I have no idea what's been done and what hasn't been. Additionally, responses should be made after reviewer's replies, not in line. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It does seem like several things listed were done but not marked off. I would go to do the fix and it was already done. As for my responses I had been doing them in a reply like this ({{Done}}) but it seems someone edited them. Rusted AutoParts 18:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Its preferred to avoid the usage of templates in FLC reviews. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Collection of the responses me and Rusted Auto Parts gave: Ref 163 contained a typo, its been fixed. Ref 85 already had an author. Ref 170 Switched cite book to standard URl cite as it's not necessarily linking directly to a copy of the book, more so linking access to it via subscription. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- So have all my comments been addressed @Rusted AutoParts and @OlifanofmrTennant? Hey man im josh (talk) 13:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Collection of the responses me and Rusted Auto Parts gave: Ref 163 contained a typo, its been fixed. Ref 85 already had an author. Ref 170 Switched cite book to standard URl cite as it's not necessarily linking directly to a copy of the book, more so linking access to it via subscription. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Its preferred to avoid the usage of templates in FLC reviews. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It does seem like several things listed were done but not marked off. I would go to do the fix and it was already done. As for my responses I had been doing them in a reply like this ({{Done}}) but it seems someone edited them. Rusted AutoParts 18:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.