Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nashville Xpress all-time roster/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 17:40, 30 July 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): NatureBoyMD (talk) 19:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this for featured list because it meets all criteria of a featured list. NatureBoyMD (talk) 19:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per 3a of the criteria. More info for the players is needed. The table looks very thin at the moment. Research a little more on the players.--Crzycheetah 06:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What kind of info? Position? (Keeping in mind that minor league players usually move around instead of sticking to one spot like the majors.) I can't think of anyother info that wouldn't seem extraneous or trivial. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 16:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment -- I'm gonna have to agree with Crzy. The list doesn't really say much about the roster itself. Why no info about their positions? Any relevant notes? Etc. I think a great way to format this would be like it is in the Worcester Worcesters all-time roster FLC.--Truco 503 19:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per above. I was thinking of exactly the list Truco mentioned, the Worcester Worcesters. They existed for basically the same length of time, and did so a century ago, yet that list has positions, notes for every player, and 63 refs to the 9 for this list. Staxringold talkcontribs 20:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for providing an example of additional information. I'll get right on it. -NatureBoyMD (talk)
- Comment - may I suggest you withdraw the nomination until you're ready to renominate it? The Rambling Man (talk) 17:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for providing an example of additional information. I'll get right on it. -NatureBoyMD (talk)
- Request for withdrawl - As nominator, I request the withdrawl of this nomination to give me adequate time to improve the list. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 17:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been withdrawn, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{FLC}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.