Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Mack 10 discography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Giants2008 10:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Mack 10 discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/Mack 10 discography/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Mack 10 discography/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): CrowzRSA 04:31, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I have put a good amount of work into it and I believe it meets the FL criteria. I haven't been on Wikipedia for a while because of college so if there are any problems I will fix them as soon as possible...So just bare with me! THANK YOU!!!!! CrowzRSA 04:31, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Soooo no one wants to comment on this easy discography???? Why is this not in the urgently needing review section... CrowzRSA 20:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose quick review, as you asked so nicely.
- Lead is too long.
- How is the lead too long? It summarizes the article and doesn't go overboard with anything. The guys released 8 studio albums, and everyone of them charted on the Billboard 200. For example, the Slipknot discography page is smaller in size yet it has a longer lead, which is necessary to summarize the article. CrowzRSA 16:57, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Check out WP:LEAD and tell me how this bypasses the guidelines. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:59, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- ......I see your point. Working on new lead here. Should have it done pretty soon though. Btw, Merry Christmas :) CrowzRSA 16:49, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay i think it should be short enough now. CrowzRSA 18:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't mix number formats in a single sentence for items which are comparable.
- " West Coast rapper Mack 10" three wikilinks butted up together is potentially confusing.
- "was awarded Gold" you mean "certified".
- Which territory is each release date pertinent to?
- Where are releases which didn't chart anywhere such as "Do tha Damn Thing" referenced?
- Doing... CrowzRSA 16:57, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done, also added refs to music videos without known directors. CrowzRSA 19:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- All refs need to comply with WP:DASH.
- I think it's fixed. CrowzRSA 19:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:34, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Better, couple of raw URLs in the refs need to be fixed. Happy New Year! The Rambling Man (talk) 09:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator. All issues were addressed and i seriously think it meets each criteria. So if there are any more issues—major or minor—please comment. CrowzRSA 17:54, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delegate comment: This candidate has been archived. There may be a delay between the closing of this nomination and the bot running through. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.