Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tied Twenty20 Internationals/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 14:37, 8 March 2015 [1].

List of tied Twenty20 Internationals

Featured list candidates/List of tied Twenty20 Internationals/archive1

Nominator(s): Harrias ^talk 12:49, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, an interesting little list. At the moment it is pretty short, and though it will certainly grow, it is unlikely to do so quickly. I have followed the tableformat of List of Cricket World Cup finals rather than the format at List of tied One Day Internationals, as I believe the former provides better information and adheres more closely to our MOS. I already have an FLC open (Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Series Cricket international centuries/archive1), but it has been stable for a while now, with three support votes and no outstanding concerns. Harrias ^talk 12:49, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Seattle (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*I previously left some comments at Template:Did you know nominations/List of tied Twenty20 Internationals, with an inclination that it might end up here. Those have been addressed.

A Twenty20 International can have three possible results; think this should be a colon
- Done. Harrias ^talk 11:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer non-centered text, but, as far as I know, that's a matter of preference
- I'm pretty ambivalent on this. I'll leave it as it is for the moment, but if others make similar comments, I don't mind changing it. Harrias ^talk 11:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This page links to only two other pages on Wikipedia; can you add it elsewhere? The tournament year articles would be prime candidates; 2012 ICC World Twenty20 for example.
- I've added in a number of extra links. Harrias ^talk 11:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following might be differences in American vs British English, but I'll list them anyways:

Zimbabwe won it 3–1 not sure "it" is needed here
- Done. Harrias ^talk 11:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
including two occurrences not sure "occurrences" is needed here Seattle (talk) 04:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Harrias ^talk 11:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support: I haven't been able to spot any issues. Miyagawa (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support: a very good list, meets the criteria. Happy to support this one! --Khadar Khani (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from —Vensatry _(ping)

Comments from —Vensatry _(ping)

Page nos. are needed for PDF refs.
- Added. Harrias ^talk 17:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
An explanation could well be added for "no result".
- I'm not sure this is necessary, as it isn't really relevant to the actual article, more an aside, and I have linked to Result (cricket). Harrias ^talk 17:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Image needs WP:ALT
- Added. Harrias ^talk 17:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wisden Cricketers' Almanack -> the Wisden Cricketers' Almanack
- I'm a bit unsure about this. "the Wisden Cricketers' Almanack" doesn't work, because there has been more than one. I think it is grammatically fine as it is, which does follow the formatting used in the source article, but if it reads awkwardly to you, then I think it would be better as "the 2007 Wisden Cricketers' Almanack". Harrias ^talk 17:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - You're right! So will it not be better to add the year of publication here? —Vensatry _(ping) 12:01, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done. Harrias ^talk 21:14, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"In all, there have been eight tied Twenty20 Internationals". Needs "as of ... " per WP:DATED
- Added a footnote. Harrias ^talk 17:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why is "International Cricket Council" alone linked twice in the refs.?
- No reason. Fixed. Harrias ^talk 17:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

—Vensatry _(ping) 19:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vensatry: As always, thanks for your comments and thoughts! Harrias ^talk 17:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Looks solid. @Harrias: Can you have a look at this one when you get time? —Vensatry _(ping) 17:24, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:29, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.