Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in St. Louis/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 00:30, 11 March 2010 [1].
List of tallest buildings in St. Louis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Nominator(s): fetchcomms☛ 18:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meets the general FL criteria as well as the guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject Skyscrapers/Tallest building lists. It has an appropriate lead, uses images throughout, and each entry is referenced. fetchcomms☛ 18:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This is a WikiCup nomination. To the nominator: if you do not intend to submit this article at the WikiCup, feel free to remove this notice. Mm40 (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- One image still needs alt text (File:Bank of America Plaza (St. Louis).jpg). Also, the alt texts can be more descriptive, but it's not that big of an issue.
- Fixed the one image. fetchcomms☛ 15:52, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- My oppose is based on the reliability of sources. Emporis is a business, so that's OK. But I still maintain that SkyscraparPage isn't reliable. Mm40 (talk) 12:23, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Mm40 (talk) |
---|
*FL no longer contain "this is a list of..." See recently promoted lists for examples.
These are just from a quick glance, so I'm not sure the list is ready right now. Mm40 (talk) 21:03, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 14:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Oppose - borderline quick-fail I'm afraid, this isn't WP:PR... but comments nevertheless...
The Rambling Man (talk) 18:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man (talk) 16:28, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.