Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs written by Tove Lo/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of songs written by Tove Lo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Paparazzzi (talk) 07:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I have been working on it for the past days and I think it meets the criteria for a FL. Tove Lo is a Swedish singer and songwriter who has not only written songs for herself but for other artists too, and this list features all of those songs, and it is referenced with sources such as the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers and Broadcast Music, Inc.. Paparazzzi (talk) 07:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Aoba47
-
- All of the images need an ALT description. Done
- Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 04:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- There are some instances where you say "Lo" instead of "Lov" so double-check to make sure you correct this. Comment: The nickname of the artist is "Tove Lo", not "Tove Lov". I understand, it is kind of confusing!
- Oops, sorry for my mistake. Aoba47 (talk) 04:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- This is more of a clarification question, but do we know who Lov offered "Love Ballad" to (you identify the person as "an artist" and I was just curious if we know exactly who this person is)? If not, then it is fine as it currently stands. Comment: Sadly, no. Lo never revealed the name of the artist.
- Thank you for the clarification. Aoba47 (talk) 04:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Paparazzzi: Very strong list! I just have two rather minor comments and one clarification question. Once my comments are addressed, then I will support this nomination. Aoba47 (talk) 15:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aoba47: I have addressed your comments! Thank you so much for the review . Regards! --Paparazzzi (talk) 03:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Great work with this! Good luck with this list. If possible, could you look at my FLC as well? Aoba47 (talk) 04:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aoba47: Ok, I'm going to take a look at your FLC. Regards . Paparazzzi (talk) 19:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 19:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aoba47: Ok, I'm going to take a look at your FLC. Regards . Paparazzzi (talk) 19:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 15:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
The FLC has been left without comments for a while. Here's some.
Cowlibob (talk) 12:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support Good list. Cowlibob (talk) 15:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Cowlibob: Thank you for everything! Regards, --Paparazzzi (talk) 02:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 12:57, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments Looks good overall. These are my edits, please revert if you disagree with any of them. Comment: Thank you! --Paparazzzi (talk) 04:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 08:23, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 12:57, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support If certain webpages can't be archived then there's really nothing more that you can do. Great work! A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 10:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 21:09, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply] @The Rambling Man: I have addressed your comments.Thank you so much, Paparazzzi (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
Comments –
"which talks about 'different kind of rushes in life'". This bit is ungrammatical at the moment. I would change one word in the quote to "kind(s)"; the MoS does allow for such minor changes inside quotes in situations like this.DoneIn the intro's photo caption, we don't really need "pictured" in parentheses, as it's fairly obvious to readers that this will be a photo of Lo. The other photos refer to both Lo and a singer, so there could be some confusion as to who is in the photo; that isn't the case here.DoneIn the table, A l'infini isn't sorting in the right order in the Album(s) column. This is because of the Latin character at the start, and will require a sorting template to fix.Done
Giants2008 (Talk) 00:17, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Giants2008: I have addressed your comments. Thank you, Paparazzzi (talk) 01:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – The fixes all look good, and I believe this meets FL standards now. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you so much! Regards, Paparazzzi (talk) 23:32, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Paparazzzi this just needs a source review now and then it's good to go. Hopefully you can find someone to do a spot check? The Rambling Man (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: I checked the links by myself. There were eleven dead links, that I replaced/archived. Regarding the format of references, Cowlibob left comments about it, comments that I have addressed. I don't really know what else to do here, since this is my fist FLC and I don't really know many users. Regards, --Paparazzzi (talk) 03:55, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Mmm, the references that I replaced now appear as ""soft 404". Is it a problem? because they actually work. Regards, Paparazzzi (talk) 04:00, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Well the point of the source check isn't just to identify if they're alive or dead, but to ensure they actually reference the material they're claiming to, hence it's usually conducted independently of the nominator. The Rambling Man (talk) 04:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: Aoba47 will do a spot check tomorrow night! Paparazzzi (talk) 19:55, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Well the point of the source check isn't just to identify if they're alive or dead, but to ensure they actually reference the material they're claiming to, hence it's usually conducted independently of the nominator. The Rambling Man (talk) 04:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Mmm, the references that I replaced now appear as ""soft 404". Is it a problem? because they actually work. Regards, Paparazzzi (talk) 04:00, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review by Aoba47
-
- Note that the access dates are not necessary in the references that are archived as the archive date covers that (no real reason to have three dates, publication/access/archive, in the citations as it is a lot).
- While checking this, several references have the message "Soft 404" as indicated by The Rambling Man above me. However, the links are working fine for me, and all of the information is supported through the references. Spotchecks and formatting checks passed. Aoba47 (talk) 00:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you so much, Aoba!
- @The Rambling Man: I have addressed Aoba's comments. So now that the source review has been done, I guess the list can be promoted. Regards, Paparazzzi (talk) 04:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.