Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of poker hands/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was unsuccessful by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 10:49:23 11 May 2019 (UTC) [1].
List of poker hands (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Hpesoj00 (talk) 00:23, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe the article to be of great interest to many readers, and I have no doubt it is referenced by many poker players. I revamped the article approximately two years ago hoping to get it to FLC, but it did not pass because of the low number of reviews (partially because I didn't have the time to make reviews for reciprocation). I certainly believe the article is of high quality, and if it isn't ready to be a FL, I would certainly like to know what needs to be improved (it has already been through peer review in pretty much its current state). Hpesoj00 (talk) 00:23, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The first thing that jumped out me was a "citation needed" tag against a statement - that definitely needs addressing......... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. Hpesoj00 (talk) 14:19, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Apologies, I forgot to check back. My only other comments are about a couple of references:
- What makes codethrowdown.com a reliable source? I would check the content but I am at work and browser security settings have blocked it, which isn't a good sign.....
- The ref entitled "How many poker hands are there?" lists no work or publisher, however a quick check indicates that it seems to just be some random person';s blog and therefore not a reliable source
- Think that's it from me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Hpesoj00: are you still active? I notice you haven't edited for more than two weeks..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:45, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I am still active. Thanks for the feedback. I will attempt to address in short order. Have been rather busy recently. Hpesoj00 (talk) 12:50, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Cool! :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Hpesoj00 Are you returning to this? The Rambling Man (talk) 13:28, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, I did not get an opportunity to revisit this. It turned out to be bad timing. Perhaps I will try again in the future when I am more sure that I will have the time to follow through. Thanks for your time and patience nonetheless. Hpesoj00 (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Hpesoj00 Are you returning to this? The Rambling Man (talk) 13:28, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Cool! :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been unsuccessful, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.