Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of hydroelectric power stations/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Rambo's Revenge 10:29, 6 February 2010 [1].
- Nominator(s): Rehman(+) 13:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Featured list candidates/List of hydroelectric power stations/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of hydroelectric power stations/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this for featured list because i believe that this list now suites to be a FL after changing the page from this to this, (note that i have moved smaller stations to regional lists). Regards. Rehman(+) 13:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Formatting definitely improved the look of the list greatly. However, there are no references. The list must be verifiable. Jujutacular T · C 18:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand. But just a question, what would be the case if all the links were blue, meaning that should be duplicate the refs from the article? Regards. Rehman(+) 01:38, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, duplicate refs from the 'child' articles are fine. Jujutacular T · C 08:51, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I see. Just asking, would i be able to withdraw the nomination? These points makes me feel like its just not the right time for the article... :) Rehman(+) 09:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, duplicate refs from the 'child' articles are fine. Jujutacular T · C 08:51, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand. But just a question, what would be the case if all the links were blue, meaning that should be duplicate the refs from the article? Regards. Rehman(+) 01:38, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose – the formatting did improve this list, but without references, it fails the FL criteria. It also has barely any lead to speak of; see WP:LEAD and WP:SAL for information on leads in stand-alone lists. Also, see recently promoted FLs for better opening sentences than "This is a list of...". KV5 (Talk • Phils) 21:25, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, you have a point. :) I will be working on the lead asap... Regards. Rehman(+) 01:38, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.