Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Spotlight (film)/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by SchroCat via FACBot (talk) 00:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of accolades received by Spotlight (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): FrB.TG (talk) 11:11, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow reviewers again! Nominating another list for FL, which is of awards received by a fantastic film of 2015. FrB.TG (talk) 11:11, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Krimuk90
- "..co-written by Josh Singer with McCarthy" ==> "written by McCarthy and Josh Singer.."
- "The film's screenplay ... is based on the The Boston Globe's "Spotlight" team, which uncovers the sexual abuse scandal in Massachusetts" Awkward use of the present tense, and not entirely correct, grammatically speaking.
- What is the Silver Mouse Award? How is it notable enough to be mentioned in the first paragraph?
- " grossing a total box office" How does one gross a box office?
- "..held the third place for the People's Choice Award" Awkward phrasing, again.
- This is an awards list, so isn't it notable to note that Spotlight is the first Best Picture winner to win only one other Oscar since the 1940s?
- "recognized with"?
- "..the film's cast was awarded with Outstanding Performance". ==> "...cast received an Outstanding Performance award"
- "It received the same award... " It's not the same award. It's an award in the same category at a different ceremony.
- "Top Ten Films"; why the caps? Krimuk|90 (talk) 09:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- All taken care of, thank you. FrB.TG (talk) 14:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support on prose after these copy-edits. Cheers! Krimuk|90 (talk) 16:39, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — Looks quite comprehensive, Frank. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 00:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Pavanjandhyala
- Was it released or premiered at the 72nd Venice International Film Festival?
- "It received the award in the same category at the ..." -- received an award. It also avoids close and unnecessary repetition of "the".
- "In addition, Spotlight was named Best Film by several critics associations, including ..." -- i think, rather saying "named Best Film", it is better to write that Spotlight was "named the best film of the year".
- "The film was also included in American Film Institute's list of the top ten films of the year." -- I think you can end it as "... list of 2015's top ten films". It is also an attempt to avoid repetition of "of the". Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I have adapted all of your suggestions, thank you. FrB.TG (talk) 06:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - nice list. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I couldn't find any outstanding issues and there are no disambiguation or dead links, and the prose is very well-written. Good job! Erick (talk) 16:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support No remaining issues as far as I can spot. Nice job. Miyagawa (talk) 18:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review
- Spot check of ten references showed the information being supported was all present; no copyvios found in those ten.
- Formatting all good; all sources are reliable, as far as I am aware.
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. - SchroCat (talk) 08:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.