Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Queen (film)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN 18:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of accolades received by Queen (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Krimuk|90 (talk) 07:08, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article provides a listing of the notable awards and nominations received by the 2014 Indian comedy-drama film Queen, starring Kangana Ranaut. This is my first film awards list at the FLC, and I hope to receive constructive comments to improve it. Krimuk|90 (talk) 07:08, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Ssven2
[edit]- "The film was edited by Abhijit Kokate and Kashyap, and the cinematography provided by Bobby Singh." — "The film was edited by Abhijit Kokate and Kashyap, while the cinematography was provided by Bobby Singh."
- Amended to was provided, though I think the "and" reads better than the "while".
- "with particular praise for its direction, performance of Ranaut, cinematography, and editing." — A source for this would be good, like IBTimes's review roundup.
- Actually, this refers to the "praise" from awarding organisations, and not the critics. Per the other accolades list on films, I'm trying to say that most organisations awarded the film for its direction, performance of Ranaut, cinematography, and editing. And this is sourced in the table.
@Krimuk90: That's all from me. Overall it's a good list. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 10:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the comments Ssven2. :) --Krimuk|90 (talk) 10:14, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Thanks for providing the reasons and for resolving my comments. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. :) --Krimuk|90 (talk) 14:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: The only thing I would suggest is to add Prometheus Global Media as publisher to The Hollywood Reporter (although it's not a really big deal). Nevertheless, excellent list again.
- --Birdienest81 (talk) 08:10, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you Birdienest. I have omitted the publisher information for newspapers and journals to maintain consistency. :) --Krimuk|90 (talk) 09:40, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support from Pavanjandhyala
[edit]Support. Good job. However one minor correction. Wikilink The Indian Express in reference number 9 and remove the same in reference number 23. And in the lead, i suggest you to replace "garnered" with words like "earned", "received" or "won". Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. :) I have corrected the first point, but "garnered" is an acceptable word so I've left that as is. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 06:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Krimuk90: Of course, it was just a suggestion, not a requirement. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 01:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Overall a well put together list.
Cowlibob (talk) 09:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support Good job. Hope to see many others in the future. Cowlibob (talk) 01:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you Cowlibob. :) --Krimuk|90 (talk) 01:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. - PresN 18:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.