Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Gravity (film)/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by SchroCat 14:00, 19 July 2014 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of accolades received by Gravity (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 14:47, 3 July 2014 (UTC), Corvoe (speak to me)[reply]
Corvoe and I are nominating this list because we believe it meets the six criteria for a featured list. We welcome constructive comments and are happy to make changes to better the article if required. Cowlibob (talk) 14:47, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: There are quite a handful of red links in the table. Could you remove them? It would make the list look better.
- --Birdienest81 (talk) 07:39, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Birdienest81: I've unlinked all the red links of people who are unlikely to have their own articles created in the near future. I've kept the ones which won or were nominated for major awards as those red links will help wikipedia grow. Hope that's ok. Anything else you would think needs changing? Cowlibob (talk) 12:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Although I'm not done doing a thorough proofread on the list, I think there's no serious problems with it.
- --Birdienest81 (talk) 00:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the support! Cowlibob (talk) 09:28, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- --Birdienest81 (talk) 00:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Although I'm not done doing a thorough proofread on the list, I think there's no serious problems with it.
- @Birdienest81: I've unlinked all the red links of people who are unlikely to have their own articles created in the near future. I've kept the ones which won or were nominated for major awards as those red links will help wikipedia grow. Hope that's ok. Anything else you would think needs changing? Cowlibob (talk) 12:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Excellent list, and I don't have any major concerns with it. Just one small point: the film is described as a "science-fiction thriller and space drama film". I think calling the film a science fiction thriller is sufficient. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 06:18, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Thanks for the support! Cowlibob (talk) 09:28, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Flawless.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you so much! Corvoe (speak to me) 11:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 14:00, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.