Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Blue Jasmine/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 19:03, 28 September 2014 [1].

List of accolades received by Blue Jasmine

[edit]

List of accolades received by Blue Jasmine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 21:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Jasmine was a particular highlight of last year primarily for Cate Blanchett's performance in the film. Here is the accolades list for it, as always, I welcome all the helpful suggestions and comments for improvements. Cowlibob (talk) 21:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by TriiipleThreat

[edit]
  • Table: The bottom note does not point to anything. You should either add {{ref|1|[I]}} to the Ceremony header or replace the note reference with a asterisk.
  • References: You should strongly consider archiving your references in order to prevent WP:LINKROT. There are many services you can use, I personally prefer WebCite. Its very simple and only takes minutes.

Overall its a very good list; well organized table, well referenced, and the lead does a good job summarizing the topic.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:13, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TriiipleThreat: Thanks for your comments. I've added a note to the date of ceremony column and archived all the references. Cowlibob (talk) 23:23, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from --Khadar Khani (talk) 17:51, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comments—
  • There is no inline citations for the second para; at least three inline citations required there!
Added. Cowlibob (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The infobox shows 32 "Won" while the list has 31
Fixed. Cowlibob (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The list is arranged in a random way i.e. "Date of ceremony" starts with March 2, 2014 and then December 19, 2013, February 8, 2014 and so on. Could you arrange this in ascending or descending order?! And also add a note that how the list is initially arranged.
Move up AACTA and is now in alphabetical order. Cowlibob (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--Khadar Khani (talk) 01:27, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that should be reserved for the film articles themselves and he has his own awards and nom article already included in the template. Cowlibob (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Sahara4u: Thanks for your comments. I've fixed all the issues you highlighted I think. Cowlibob (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from —Vensatry (Ping me)
Comments from —Vensatry (ping)
  • "July 26, 2013" and August 23: Not in the same format. Also year should be mentioned for more clarity
If it's the same year, there's no need to mention the year twice but changed the sentence so it's clearer that it's the same year. Cowlibob (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Years needed for "86th Academy Awards" and " 71st Golden Globe Awards" in the lede
Changed. Cowlibob (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • You've listed the producers (on behalf of the movie) in the Producers Guild of America Awards, where as in other awards only the name of the movie is mentioned. The source doesn't mention the name of the producers either.
Changed to the film itself. Cowlibob (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot comment on the comprehensiveness of the list owing to my limited knowlegde on the subject and topic. The list seems to meet the rest of the criteria and I'd be happy to lend my support once my concerns have been addressed. —Vensatry (ping) 18:08, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Vensatry: Thanks for your comments. I've fixed all the issues you highlighted I think. Cowlibob (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from SchroCat

[edit]
  • I'm not a big fan of rowspans as there are access issues with them (see Avoiding rowspan/colspan), but I'm not sure that is an enforceable criteria.
  • Be consistent in your spacings in refs: some have " ' and some have "' (compare FNs 11 and 14, but there are others)
  • Be consistent in providing publisher details: you do for some, but there are a lot of gaps

That's it from me: very slender fare for a well put together list. - SchroCat (talk) 22:00, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@SchroCat: Thanks for your comments. I've fixed the spacing and added publishers wherever possible. I don't know if it helps that the rows return after the column is sorted. Cowlibob (talk) 10:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Well done once again Cowlibob (talk · contribs), though I am not sure if describing the film as a "comedy-drama" is apt. I think it has been generally described as a drama. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 07:01, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Krimuk90: It's not a pure comedy but I've seen it described as a black comedy which I've changed in the lead as well. Thanks for the support! Cowlibob (talk) 10:30, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Looks consistent with all the other film accolade lists that are featured articles.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 06:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_accolades_received_by_Blue_Jasmine/archive1&oldid=1138485364"