Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Seattle Seahawks first-round draft picks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted 23:50, 23 December 2007.
Meets the criteria and is up to par with other lists that follow the same topic (List of Jacksonville Jaguars first-round draft picks, List of Baltimore Ravens first-round draft picks, etc.). Self-nom
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 23:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Meets WP:FLC, and it is structured identically to a number of other first-round draft pick FLs. Good work! Nishkid64 (talk) 02:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, fairly straightforward. Wonder if we'll end up with a featured topic... (with List of National Football League first overall draft choices, I'd assume...) Circeus (talk) 03:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment why is there no link on the 1976 draft? Buc (talk) 11:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Because it's linked in the lead, I'd assume. I admit it's a bit unexpected. Circeus (talk) 16:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah that would be the reason, no biggie though if people want it linked also in the table. The reason I didnt link it in the table was because when I look at the article on my computer screen, I can see both instances where the '76 draft is mentioned, so I thought it would be repetitive to link both.
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 18:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Dunno, in this case, quite a few people will want to skip straight to the stats. Circeus (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I linked it, like I said, no biggie :-)
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 19:11, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I linked it, like I said, no biggie :-)
- Dunno, in this case, quite a few people will want to skip straight to the stats. Circeus (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah that would be the reason, no biggie though if people want it linked also in the table. The reason I didnt link it in the table was because when I look at the article on my computer screen, I can see both instances where the '76 draft is mentioned, so I thought it would be repetitive to link both.
- Because it's linked in the lead, I'd assume. I admit it's a bit unexpected. Circeus (talk) 16:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Looks good. Would love to see some more pictures - some of the players, maybe? But looks good. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.