Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Scotland national football team hat-tricks/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 19:12, 10 May 2011 [1].
List of Scotland national football team hat-tricks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Miyagawa (talk) 18:52, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
After randomly coming across the FL List of England national football team hat-tricks, I checked to see if there was a Scottish article and there was - I've changed it to match the formatting on the England FL, expanded the prose section and added the conceded section. Hit a problem image-wise as there simply doesn't seem to be much in the way of free use images available for Scottish players listed (in fact, there isn't a single one). Miyagawa (talk) 18:52, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose until a few issues are solved:
- no reference provided that these 29 are the only 3 or more goals scored
- same for those scored against (I am suspicious that the list is so short)
- There isn't a specific reference to say either - essentially I went through the entire list of Scotland results to double check and collate the article. I've added a general reference for the index page of the website, but in order to place an inline citation for either of those comments on the tables below, I'd have to insert 21 seperate citations for each (as the information is spread across 21 seperate webpages). Miyagawa (talk) 12:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- An fairly elegant solution would be to use something like that at List_of_Metallica_concert_tours#Notes. Nergaal (talk) 21:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I've implemented a similar solution. Miyagawa (talk) 22:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- color scheme needed for 4 goals and for the instance where Scotland actually lost (really rare to score a hat-trick and still lose
- Its only happened once, in the 3-4 defeat against Norway on 4 June 1963. Would a note be more appropriate as it's a single occurance? Miyagawa (talk) 12:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a quick note as I realized I missed it - I've added a color scheme for 4 goals. Miyagawa (talk) 12:04, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- a hat-trick is 3 goals, not more
Nergaal (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:32, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 09:26, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 23:07, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
Resolved comments from Arsenikk (talk) 08:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments:
Arsenikk (talk) 20:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support Arsenikk (talk) 08:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - all looks OK to me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 20:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comment mildly trouble by the use of yellow alone to denote "more than a hat-trick scored" (according to the key). WP:ACCESS needs a symbol plus a colour if you're going to use a colour. I know the table is reasonable because it has 4 or 5 as well as yellow, but the key doesn't... Other thing, which is well picky is that sorting by result in the Scotland hat-trick table should, in my mind sort "best result first" or "worst result first"? So when listed in descending "best results", I would expect to see 8–0 come before 8–1 and that to come before 8–2. It's not a big issue, but one which would I would delight in being sorted (no pun intended) if possible. Oh, and ref 2 could use an accessdate... The Rambling Man (talk) 14:52, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support brilliant. I love working with editors like Miyagawa. Considerate, grateful, attentive, all good. Nice work. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.