Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Roman Emperors/archive2
Appearance
I have incorporated amendments in order to address the objections raised against the previous failed nomination
(see Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Roman Emperors/archive1).
--JohnArmagh 09:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comments:
- 1. Haven't worked out how to integrate that yet
- 2. Briefly introduced the main titles with wikilinks
- 3. I agree
- --JohnArmagh 11:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- comments: no particular value is added by wikilinking every standalone year and year-month. Only year-monty-day should be linked for date reading preferences. Hmains 21:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comments:
- The term "optimus" could be better translated than "the best"
- As per Tompw no.2
- Too much dense CAPITALS in the columns with the latin names. Doesn't make it easy to read.
- Though consistent and comprehensive, the formatting is uninteresting/dull. The page is not aesthetically pleasing.
Witty lama 15:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comments Lead full of short one-sentence paragraphs. Needs to be expanded and flow. Please supply ISBN (and possibly edition) for the book references. Colin°Talk 11:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Oppose due to issues with lead mentioned above, and also complete lack of images. Tompw (talk) 21:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Where is there a definition of the word 'list' such that it is mandatory for such to contain images? --JohnArmagh 16:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)