Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Presidents of Vietnam/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by NapHit 02:39, 25 December 2012 [1].
List of Presidents of Vietnam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): --TIAYN (talk) 19:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Vietnam... --TIAYN (talk) 19:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 14:34, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Oppose for now on images and referencing
File:Picture of Nguyen Huu Tho.jpeg is Fair Use and fails the NFCCFile:Picture of Vo Chi Cong.jpeg is fair use and fails the NFCC.- Done File:Ho Chi Minh 1946 cropped.jpg - Needs proof of publication in or before 1947, otherwise it would have fallen afoul of the URAA (per Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights)
- Done File:TonDucThang1948.jpg - No proof of 1948 publication, and this would have fallen afoul of the URAA
File:Truong Chinh.png - If its an official portrait, it's not copyrighted by the Romanian National Archives. The Vietnamese photographer or publisher would hold the rights.File:Nguyen Minh Triet.jpg needs a date.- The Van and Cooper short footnote goes nowhere. The other ones are not used for footnotes (if they are general resources, I think six books is a bit of overkill for this list) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:38, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- With the exception of the Van & Cooper note and the point with the fair use images, you are completely wrong with everything you just wrote here... All of these pictures have a date (with the exception of one, which I fixed), and all of these pictures are in the public domain in Vietnam.. Stupid.... --TIAYN (talk) 16:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- A date they were taken, not when they were published. The copyright in Vietnam is based on publication date. They may be (probably are) PD in Vietnam, but not in the US as they would have been extended by the URAA. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:19, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Please don't edit my comments. If I am satisfied, I will strike them. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:20, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, please redact your personal attack. Calling me stupid will not change the fact that several of these images are possibly not PD in the US.
- Regarding the bibliography, what is the reason for having six books listed? You say its not overkill, why? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I wrote Done for a reason, I've fixed it (the books and ther eferences that is). --TIAYN (talk) 16:35, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You can write underneath if need be. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:37, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- With the exception of the Van & Cooper note and the point with the fair use images, you are completely wrong with everything you just wrote here... All of these pictures have a date (with the exception of one, which I fixed), and all of these pictures are in the public domain in Vietnam.. Stupid.... --TIAYN (talk) 16:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Prime Ministers of Vietnam/archive1, an active FLC by the same nominator, has not received substantial support yet (I'd hardly consider one support substantial). With that in mind, I think this should be withdrawn until that FLC closes.On a separate note, there's no justification for calling a reviewer stupid for telling you something you don't like, especially somebody like Crisco who is a dedicated reviewer at FAC and FLC. Please refrain from doing so in the future. Giants2008 (Talk) 18:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have a tendency to use aggressive wording, doesn't really mean anything... Me calling someone stupid is, well, a very common occurrence. --TIAYN (talk) 16:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
General comment I would advocate merging all these minimalist tables into one larger one, with an additional column for the title of the "president". Right now it's a bit messy. Once that's done, I'm happy to review the whole thing. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, but I was told that such structuring was breach of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Data tables tutorial. --TIAYN (talk) 08:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Well it depends entirely on how you restructure it. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, but I was told that such structuring was breach of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Data tables tutorial. --TIAYN (talk) 08:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "supervises the work as well as preserving the stability of the national governmental system" - perhaps "as well as preserving"→'and preserves'?
- "Officially there have been 9 presidents of Vietnam, but there have, in total, been 14 presidents if the ones of South Vietnam are counted." - per WP:ORDINAL write these numbers out in full
- The rank is confusing. Upon navigating to the linked article, I now assume that it means rank in the party (it seems odd that the president isn't always top dog). The note to the table is long and confusing to me. Can this idea be clarified in the text or table better please?
- File:Ho Chi Minh 1946 cropped.jpg and File:TonDucThang1948.jpg are up for deletion. I siggest finding alternative images
- File:Picture of Nguyen Huu Tho.jpeg and File:Picture of Vo Chi Cong.jpeg are non-free have no FUR for this list; I removed them
—Andrewstalk 09:51, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.