Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Phi Kappa Psi brothers/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 01:49, 7 May 2010 [1].
List of Phi Kappa Psi brothers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Nominator(s): NYCRuss ☎ 00:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because after going through a peer review, I believe that this list is either ready for featured list status, or is just a few tweaks away from getting there. NYCRuss ☎ 00:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC) Forgot to add CoI disclosure. I'm a member of Phi Kappa Psi. NYCRuss ☎ 14:51, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from GrapedApe (talk) 15:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Initial review of the lead
--GrapedApe (talk) 02:16, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support (for the things I looked at) - The things that I checked looked good, like the lead, the construction of the list, the sources, and the images. I did not check the notability text or whether the sources actually said what they were supposed to, so I can't speak to those things. Overall, it feels like a winner, with just the caveats for things I didn't check. Good work! --GrapedApe (talk) 19:34, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ImGz (t/c) 01:34, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support --ImGz (t/c) 19:32, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 15:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 09:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
Quick comment – Lead looks okay to me, with the exception of this one sentence: "In academia, Phi Psis are among over a dozen university presidents...". I would hope that all of them are/were Phi Psis, or they wouldn't be relevant to this list. Some restructuring of the sentence is all that will be required to fix this.Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:24, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That sentence has been changed to this: "Academian Phi Psis include over a dozen university presidents (
includingamong these are Priestley Medal recipient Edgar Fahs Smith, and Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient Detlev Bronk), Rhodes scholars, and Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Frederick Jackson Turner." How is that? NYCRuss ☎ 23:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That sentence has been changed to this: "Academian Phi Psis include over a dozen university presidents (
- Comment I would move Judge Advocate Generals in the lead to either the front or back of that sentence. As it stands currently the sentence reads "dozens of generals and admirals (general titles, not people) including [specific person], JAGs, [specific person], [specific person]." That order seems a bit confusing to me as JAGs don't really fit with the "dozens of generals... including" sentence order." Maybe put it in it's own sentence entirely. Staxringold talkcontribs 17:12, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I changed it. How does it read now? NYCRuss ☎ 17:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Much better. Support Staxringold talkcontribs 17:49, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Jujutacular T · C 17:44, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support Nice looking list, good work. Jujutacular T · C 17:44, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. I can not find any problem that could prevent promotion of this list to the Featured status. Ruslik_Zero 19:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.