Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (2010–2019)/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 1 May 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (2010–2019)

[edit]

List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (2010–2019) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): - Vivvt (Talk) 07:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Last list under Padma Bhushan recipients category. The list is based on similar current Featured Lists 1954–1959, 1960–1969, 1970–1979, 1980–1989, 1990–1999, and 2000–2009. I am nominating this for featured list because with some inputs from you this can easily become a featured content. Looking forward to some constructive comments. - Vivvt (Talk) 07:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Done
  • Period missing from some alt texts.
  • Done
  • At ref 25, Times of India --> The Times of India.
  • Done
  • Ref 44, Indian Express --> The Indian Express.
  • Done
  • Use numbers instead of letters, per MOS:NUM. Like, forty-three should be simply 43.
  • Per MOS:NUMS, Integers greater than nine expressible in one or two words may be expressed either in numerals or in words. Numbers between 21 and 99 are hyphenated. I prefer to use words, just to maintain consistency across all Padma FLs.

Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yashthepunisher: I have addressed some of your concerns. Please let me know if you have more. - Vivvt (Talk) 08:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Yashthepunisher: Thanks for your comments and support. - Vivvt (Talk) 08:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 13:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Don't start consecutive sentences with "As of 2018".
  • Done
  • Personal preference, but I usually use † for posthumous awards, rather than hash.
  • I had used dagger template earlier but one of the reviewers mentioned in one of the other Padma FLCs that they had trouble doing "Ctrl+F" with dagger. So changed it altogether. This was the comment --> "Also, instead of using the Template:Dagger, can you insert the symbol "†"? The purpose of having a symbol along with colour coding is that it should help colour-blind people. But the template doesn't allow you to copy the dagger symbol and Ctrl+F it. This direct use of symbol will allow Ctrl+Fing for lazy guys like me." Let me know if that needs to changed.
  • "fields of Neotectonics, Sedimentology, and Environmental geolog..." no need for the capitalisation.
  • Done
  • I'm guessing you based 3/4 of the lead on previously promoted FLs? In which case some attribution (e.g. on the talk page) is needed for GFDL.
  • Done

Otherwise good work. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:37, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: I have addressed some of your concerns. Please let me know if you have more. - Vivvt (Talk) 08:19, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: Thanks for your comments and support. - Vivvt (Talk) 13:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Courcelles: Thanks for your changes and support. - Vivvt (Talk) 16:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from VedantTalk 18:08, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Vedant
  • "The name of a recipient, whose award have been revoked or restored, both of which require the authority of the President" - have or has?
Done
  • Not sure who "the Ministers" are.
  • It means "the Ministers", the Chief Ministers and the Governors "of State". Linked accordingly.
  • I think the captions should include (awarded in X year) instead to just the year to clarify. Currently, it might be read as the year that the picture was taken in.
Done
  • ""his contacts in the Prime Minister's Office and United States Congress"" - The quotes aren't needed as it's nothing critical.
Done
  • "The Government" - You might want to clarify "The Government of India" as there is a lot of USA in the paragraph. Also, it improves the context of "the country's" in the next sentence.
Done
  • Why mention "PMO" at the second occurrence of the Prime Minister’s Office?
Done
  • "Ronen Sen who was then serving" - comma needed.
Done
  • "had told PMO" - the?
Done
  • I don't know if you could call the J. S. Verma bit a controversy, but I'll leave that to you.
  • Right. Thats why the section title is "Controversies and refusals". Verma's inclusion is under refusals.
  • Oh wow, I completely read over that somehow.

The rest looks good. VedantTalk 03:15, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Numerounovedant: I have addressed most of your concerns. Please let me know if you have more. - Vivvt (Talk) 17:53, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I can support this for promotion on prose standards. Fine work. VedantTalk 18:08, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Numerounovedant: Thanks for your comments and support. - Vivvt (Talk) 18:13, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 20:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_Padma_Bhushan_award_recipients_(2010–2019)/archive1&oldid=839058949"