Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Olympic medalists in triathlon/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 23:37, 20 July 2010 [1].
List of Olympic medalists in triathlon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Parutakupiu (talk) 16:12, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was supposed to nominate this some time ago, but I feared that its length—which is nothing more than a direct consequence of the sport's recent and young Olympic history—would be an argument against it during the reviewing process. At that time, this list had more content which I ended up removing (making it even shorter) because it wasn't that vital or topic-related. Anyway, apart from this, I believe it fills all the other criteria... but that's up to you to judge. So, I appreciate any input. Parutakupiu (talk) 16:12, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 16:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments.
- An Olympic Congress doesn't have the power to add sports to the Programme; this is done by an IOC session, not the Congress. (Though they are held in the same city/timeframe, they are separate things.) Your source doesn't say if it happened in Lillehammer or Paris, as two IOC sessions were held in 1994.
- You're right, it doesn't say anything besides the year it was accepted. Don't know why, I think I just assumed... Parutakupiu (talk) 23:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why the unusual table of contents?
- If you check other similar FLs, it's quite usual. It was used mostly for those sports with many events which would yield a "mile long" table of contents. Parutakupiu (talk) 23:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Really, this list comes down to size. I remember seeing it a couple weeks ago and thinking it was an excellent FLC after London, but we do have 18 medallists, so, I could be persuaded either way on 3b.
Courcelles (talk) 22:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed, you are totally right. I still had some doubts, but your comment just goes towards what I described above. This list is still not long enough to fully comply with criterium 3b, so I decided not to proceed with this nomination. Thanks anyway. Parutakupiu (talk) 23:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw nomination, due to lack of compliance with criterium 3b. Parutakupiu (talk) 23:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.