Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Oklahoma Sooners head baseball coaches/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 23:24, 8 December 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): —NMajdan•talk 19:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meets all criteria for FL.—NMajdan•talk 19:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose has less than 10 items - per 3b because this "can reasonably be included as part of a related article."—Chris!c/t 23:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment
- It does appear that this could very easily be incorporated into the main Sooners articles. It would have no effect on a potential featured topic as far as I can tell if you did merge it. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no way a section could be included in a featured topic. I would have to bring the whole article up to GA or FA quality for it to even be considered.—NMajdan•talk 16:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you missed my point. There is no reason for this list to exist on its own. All the information should be included in the main Sooners article. Then a featured topic is still a possibility (should that be your aim) because you'd be able to get all relevant articles to good or featured status. In my opinion this list simply has too few entries to be considered "Wikipedia's finest work". The Rambling Man (talk) 18:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Oklahoma Sooners baseball article already does list all of the coaches, though not with as much detail. This table, with the additional detail, could be merged into that article, and parts of the lead trimmed down to create a "lead paragraph" for the embedded list, as suggested at WP:EMBED, treating the tabled list as "children" below the main paragraph of the section. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 13:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you missed my point. There is no reason for this list to exist on its own. All the information should be included in the main Sooners article. Then a featured topic is still a possibility (should that be your aim) because you'd be able to get all relevant articles to good or featured status. In my opinion this list simply has too few entries to be considered "Wikipedia's finest work". The Rambling Man (talk) 18:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no way a section could be included in a featured topic. I would have to bring the whole article up to GA or FA quality for it to even be considered.—NMajdan•talk 16:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – 3b. A list already exists in the main article, as KV5 points out, and I see no reason for a seperate list to exist either. What's here can easily be moved to Oklahoma Sooners baseball to replace the smaller table. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 17:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.