Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Oh My Goddess episodes

List of Oh My Goddess episodes

I think this page meets all of the recuirements of Featured lists. List includes all OVA's and released TV serries (ongoing) as well as the movie. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 13:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support I support my own nom. :P --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 13:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: what's up with the "Adventures of the mini Goddess" section? why is it empty? Also having so many fair use images may be an issue. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 14:14, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
See List of Star Trek: TNG episodes more images there. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 14:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but that's not a FL. Plus we have a precedent on that in Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of South Park episodes 2 -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 16:51, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I seriosuly believe it is necesary to have one very low resolution screenshot for identification and critical commentary on the film and its contents. And hence qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Each episode has about 32000+ frames. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 16:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

While I am not trying to accuse anyone of anything, just a reminder: we should evade m:Copyright Paranoia. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 17:01, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Then I guess you may have to provide a fair use rationale as to why a particular frame was chosen. There are definitely people who know better than I do on this subject, but I was only pointing out a particular concern that has been raised here before. No need to get defensive with the copyright paranoia link. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 19:10, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know how much more can I expand this... --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 03:04, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The most notable event on episode one is the arrival of Belldandy, the most notable event of the second episode is Keiichi getting kicked out of his dorm. The most notable event of third episode is belldandy using her powers to repairing the temple which is why Koshan leaves the temple for a nation wide pilgrimage. The pictures are from these events. To better illustrate the episodes the pictures are more then necesary. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 11:39, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, write that on each image's description page and you'll be all set. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 15:12, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That is what the template suggests isnt it? " screenshot for identification and critical commentary on the film and its contents." --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 15:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But that's only for an article on each individual episode. You have to provide a separate rationale for additional uses, such as in this list. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. Your call, really, but this objection is actionable and if you refuse to act on it I'll vote oppose at the end. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 20:04, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you predetermined your vote please do not waiste my time. Also read m:Copyright Paranoia. All images used on the list appear on a linked article for the episode. The list unifies it all. It is still for the same episode. Geeez --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 23:25, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

1) I've read it, it is not policy, and there is a fair bit of disagreement on the page itself. 2) My understanding of fair use is that it allows use of an image once and requires a rationale for further uses. 3) You cannot choose to simply ignore precedent. 4) If you don't want (or care) to work on those rationales simply say so and it will not be held against you, but bear in mind that getting articles featured goes a bit further than a stamp-of-approval process. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 17:12, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

To back up my claim, I provide this link where it currently says every page that uses the image will have a distinct rationale for using the image on that page even though Fair Use is claimed on the image page. Yes it is under revision but it is the most current guideline we have on this. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 17:21, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I did as you asked. However not because I agree with the mess you mentioned. Serously, have a read of m:Copyright Paranoia. Currently your complaits have been about the tagging of the images which has NOTHING to do with the article here. If there is a violation of fair-use in your view, your concerns should have beem adressed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. The template is generic so we dont deal with this stuff... You really are giving me a hard time. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 21:51, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. Note that I did not ask you to remove the frames, but to provide a fair use rationale for each of them as per Wikipedia:Fair use, which in my opinion is straight-forward. But you can do as you see fit. This will be my last comment on this nomination. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 21:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to edit 24 image pages writing a uneque paragraph to each, id rather delete the entier article. Given the template is more than enough. I really find staring a wall without purpose more productive. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 22:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adventures of the mini Goddess section removed. I want to treated that as a seperate entity. Adventures of the mini Goddess was a "super deformed" serries completely detached from the plot of the OVA TV and Movie. Furthere more each episode was about 12 minutes (8 minutes without the opening and ending theme). Ill remove the section now. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 14:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oppose - needs a major copyedit. Full of typos, spelling and grammatical errors, from the very first sentence onwards. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 14:16, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, sending in the Cavlary. :) --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 14:29, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Better? --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 14:53, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Much better, definitely, but not quite there yet. Still contains sentences like "Sora Hasegawa, whom has no self confidence, is enlisted to race on the upcoming race for women only." --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 10:05, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Easy fix. :) You seem to have a tallent in locateing such errors, why not copy edit too :) --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 11:39, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I really cant see anything else, please tell me what you see is wrong and I can gladly fix it, furtehrmore I do not object you fixing them for me :) --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 23:43, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not happy about the quality of the text, a lot of which reads like it's been written by a non-native English speaker. I'd happily fix things myself, but I don't know the series at all. I'm switching to Neutral, rather than actually opposing, as it has improved - but I'm still not convinced that this is an example of "Wikipedia's best work". --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 10:50, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've done what I can to sort out the language. Have a look at the changes I've made, and if you can confirm that I haven't changed any meanings I'll switch to supporting this. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 11:09, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Impresive work. Yup looks all good. :) --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 21:32, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I agree that this has too many images... pare the number of those down and it may be of a high enough quality. AKMask 11:06, 10 December 2005 (UTC) -AKMask 12:25, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Too many images he says, loads fine on a 56k link. I wont do that. I cannot and will not reduce the number of images (from 11) to anything lower, man facs are so annoying. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 11:21, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. I removed the images that most bothered me, made sure the list still looked fine. Fufills all requirements. -AKMask 12:25, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  Yah that wasnt bad, I thought you were complaining about DVD covers :P --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 11:12, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support -all the work done to this article has brought it up to FA status, in my opinion, but I'm peeved I wasn't invited to this sooner- I would have liked to work on it. :) -MegamanZero |transerver 19:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE from one of the FL directors: OFFICIAL OPPOSE I was about to promote this when I noticed there was no "references section". If the external links are references, please change the heading of the section, or separate out which external links are references and which aren't. I'll leave this nomination another 4 days to sort this objection out (and to allow for further comments if required), jguk 08:48, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, get him ;) I thought I had opposed on those grounds but apparently not. To be clear - this is generally an excellent list, apart from failing that one criterion. -- ALoan (Talk) 18:03, 21 December 2005 (UTC) [reply]
  - Support as it now stands. -- ALoan (Talk) 11:15, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Absolutely. Had references not been in issue I would have promoted the list this morning. Once this point is dealt with, (barring last minute additional objections, of course,) I expect this to be a featured list, jguk 18:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - Really its a thing of the past. :) I did use the referances cited, I just had forgottent to cite it :) --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 21:55, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~, no References section which is specifically called for in the FL Criteria. -- Ian ≡ talk 16:49, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It is directly from episodes themselves each episode is its own, The external links do contain the info you are looking for indirectly, adding more direct source links. :) --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 20:41, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I did as you asked. I am not citing sources for the OVAs or the DVD as that is common knowlage, you can search for it even on amazon. Also the exiting scans of DVD/VHS covers on is adequate enough. :) --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 20:49, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Furtheremore I actualy cited OVAs :) --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 21:46, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Changed to Support as references have appeared. An excellent piece of work. -- Ian ≡ talk 00:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]