Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of No Doubt awards/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 10:03, 2 August 2008 [1].
I think that this is a decent list. Hopefully you agree ;) Gary King (talk) 02:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Question why are nominating so many pages at the same time? --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 21:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I like the music. Also, I'm reviewing articles while I nominate some of my own, so I think the universe balances out :) Gary King (talk) 21:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- Refs [6] to [9] are most definitely not specific references, they point to the home page of those various chart websites. They don't reference the claims at all.
- "minus lead singer " would prefer without, a little less mathematical!
- "3x Platinum " any reason why that can't be written out in English, ie. three-times Platinum?
- Any reason why you re-link the albums/singles in each section? The list isn't that long so, in my humblest of humble opinions, this may be overlinking. Especially when Hey Baby, Don't Speak and Underneath It All aren't linked in the second table. Further, curious anomaly - you link the albums and singles but not the band...I'd look at the linking all over again.
- Shouldn't ref 5 be "Featured artist: No Doubt" for the
title
? A little more descriptive than "Billboard 200".
- The Rambling Man (talk) 07:22, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- All done Gary King (talk) 07:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Refs 6 to 9, not 6 and 9! Can you fix 7 and 8 too please? Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 07:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah right; done Gary King (talk) 08:07, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Refs 6 to 9, not 6 and 9! Can you fix 7 and 8 too please? Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 07:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- All done Gary King (talk) 07:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Seeing they've had so few awards, I'm surprised you've used so many references. Can't find any real fault with it, so a late support. Red157(talk • contribs) 16:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.