Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of New Mexico hurricanes/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 10:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of New Mexico hurricanes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) and Hurricanehink (talk · contribs)
I am nominating this for featured list because I think this list is very well-done. Twelve months and 25 days ago, my friend Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) wrote a comprehensive list on storms that affect a place when you think hurricane will not go, New Mexico. Shortly after its publication, the author told me on IRC that he was impressed with how much info he found (who IIRC thought about making this article as early as Fall 2011) and thus pressured me into making List of Nevada hurricanes. In April of last year, he offered me a collab of this fine list, which due to lack of interest I declined. Earlier this year, he made a similar proposal of such nomination, of which we nearly got to FLC. However, I got a bit busy in early February and the whole project died of until tonight when it occurred to me I never sent this list to FLC. So, here goes nothing, and yes Hurricanehink is co-noming and yes this is a WP:CUP nomination. YE Pacific Hurricane 03:49, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yerp. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:51, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from --Tomcat (7) 16:18, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comments
|
- Support as well.--Tomcat (7) 16:18, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Crisco 1492 (talk) |
---|
*Comments from Crisco 1492
|
- Support on prose. Looks fairly solid, easy enough to follow. You might catch flack from not using a table, but I don't think that list = table. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Awesome, thanks! And it follows the format of other articles (like List of Texas hurricanes (1980–present)). --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:26, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment — all NCDC links are broken. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 03:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- What do you think is the best way of sorting them. Replacing the url and switching the template? YE Pacific Hurricane 21:53, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't find a replacement url for pre-2000. What should I do? Keep doing what I did for 1996 and 1998? YE Pacific Hurricane 16:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nah, that didn't work. You gotta replace it with the accompanying monthly report - http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/IPS/sd/sd.html --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:17, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't find a replacement url for pre-2000. What should I do? Keep doing what I did for 1996 and 1998? YE Pacific Hurricane 16:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- What do you think is the best way of sorting them. Replacing the url and switching the template? YE Pacific Hurricane 21:53, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there a good reason not to put the bullets into a sortable table with 3 columns (date, name, notes)? Nergaal (talk) 19:35, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it works best just as prose, considering how long the descriptions are for some storms. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:52, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- What you could do, if you wanted a table, is do something similar to what I did for List of Arizona hurricanes#Storms. I would not encourage changing the existing list/prose into a table. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 20:00, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 13:57, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Quick comment – Minor point, but ref 6 should be showing up as pp. instead of p. since the citation is to multiple pages.Giants2008 (Talk) 14:05, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - no issues found worth mentioning (some redirects that are benign). Consider archiving your online references via web.archive.org or webcitation.org, so that any future changes or removals of content at those websites do not affect your citations here. --PresN 18:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.