Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of New Jersey Devils head coaches
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 10 days, 7 support, 0 oppose. Promote. --MarcK 03:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Self-nom. Diff. I believe it fits all, except for a single one, Featured List criteria. The only one which it doesn't fit, for good reason, is that it has no images. The reason it has no images is because only one of the people on the list has an image on wikipedia and there's no room to put it in next to the list without it adding a horizontal scroll. I'd be willing to add the image if it's still needed, though. BsroiaadnTalk 18:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support it without images. I have helped a bit on this article. The details are accurate and it's laid out well, in my opinion. JHMM13(Disc) 18:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: I find nothing missing in the article. In fact, i don't think FL pages need images. Many of the cricket FL pages lack pics. --Kalyan 07:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support as has been said already. Kaiser matias 07:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I think it's good, but I don't really like the fact that the stats and the Head coach name are centered vertically because of the assistant coaches. It kind of confuses me when reading the stats and doesn't look good. But maybe that's just me.--Serte [ Talk · Contrib ] 14:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply: Do you mean that you think we should get rid of the assistant coaches or that we should put in valign="top" so that all the coaches go to the top of their rows? BsroiaadnTalk 18:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply: There isn't really a solution to the problem, it's just that I don't like those high and thin cells. But, I don't really see a way of solving that, so, that's fine.--Serte [ Talk · Contrib ] 18:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply: Do you mean that you think we should get rid of the assistant coaches or that we should put in valign="top" so that all the coaches go to the top of their rows? BsroiaadnTalk 18:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as per nom. Nice job Bsroiaadn, way to clean it up & make it look great! Anthony Hit me up... 11:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per nom. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 12:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Very comprehensive and well-made. Doesn't need pictures to be featured, in my opinion anyway. Sportskido8 06:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]