Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of New England Patriots head coaches

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 23:06, 26 May 2008 [1].

List of New England Patriots head coaches

previous FLC (20:12, 11 May 2008) Self-nomination Well written lead, and well referenced table. Seems readt for FL. « Milk's Favorite Cookie ^{( talk / contribs)} 19:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support (as nom) « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie ^{( talk / contribs)} 21:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why the re-nomaination so soon after the first failed? And what is with the arrogant nomination statement of the well written lead when you yourself wrote it? Qst (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm renominating it because the first nomination simply failed because of "lack of comments" « Milk's Favorite Cookie ^{( talk / contribs)} 19:26, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Qst, he's just trying to highlight why he thinks it meets the FL criteria. There's no penalty against stroking your ego once in a while. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 21:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Further: I actually didn't write the lead; Jayron32 rewrote it. « Milk's Favorite Cookie ^{( talk / contribs)} 21:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Okay, no probs - I was just curious. Qst (talk) 15:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved - Noble Story (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I think if you refer to a person once, you only need to refer to them by their last name after that (i.e when you mention Holovak, Berry, Parcells, etc. again).
John Mazur should be wikilinked at first mention.
Mazur's incident should be referenced.
"When the team qualified for the playoffs, Fairbanks was reinstated. He lost the first playoff game, his last for the Patriots." Perhaps these two sentences could be combined?
Instead of saying "statistics cover through...", try "statistics are through".
Why do you need both a color and an asterisk to indicate a Hall of Fame coach?

Noble Story (talk) 09:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- ( Done with everything except there should be both an asterisk (*) and the color per WP:COLORS. « Milk's Favorite Cookie ^{( talk / contribs)} 21:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More comments from Noble Story

The reference you provide for Mazur being fired does not name Mazur at all in the article.
Perhaps the last sentence in the lead about the stats could be made into a note? Or, do you really need a note saying it's a current total? It would be presumed the list is up-to-date.

Noble Story (talk) 06:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Fixed Mazur reference, and updated his and Bengston's numbers. Databasefootball's numbers must be wrong, since BOTH of the references mention that Mazur had resigned with 5 games left to go in the season, and not 1.
- The last sentance seems germaine since the reader should know when the stats apply for. Especially once the season starts, such a reference is likely to be important. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 12:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Gary King (talk · contribs)

Gary King (talk) 01:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remove italics from publishers in references that are not periodicals.
Can something be done with paragraphs in the lead that consist of a single sentence?

Gary King (talk) 00:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- There is only one one-sentence paragraphs, and it is fine the way it is. It is a completely different idea from the last, which warrents a new para. Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks good to me now. However, one quibble: Perhaps the last sentence of the lead could go down as a note at the end of the table (like so). Noble Story (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work, no major issues. As always, a copyedit wouldn't hurt, but the prose is generally good. Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 18:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.