Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of National Treasures of Japan (temples)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 22:39, 14 April 2010 [1].
List of National Treasures of Japan (temples) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Nominator(s): bamse (talk) 08:13, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
After two recently featured shortish lists, this is another list of the series of lists of National Treasures of Japan. It uses the same structure as the already featured castle, shrine, residences, painting and sculpture lists. I tried to incorporate comments from previous FLCs. bamse (talk) 08:13, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Early commentsSupport
- Some of the refs need ordering (particularly placing #10 before others, but also I see #29 before #27 in the last paragraph).
- Extra space between #18 and #10 (which need reordering) after the sentence "natural environment in contrast to symmetrical layouts." Staxringold talkcontribs 15:01, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I reordered all references. There should be a bot for that (or is there already?). Also fixed the extra space. bamse (talk) 17:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Check the toolbox; there are a few dead links. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:44, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It seems that a few organizations decided to re-organize their websites with the start of the new fiscal year on April 1. Already fixed one link. It'll take some time to find the new location of the other pages since google is still pointing to the old locations. bamse (talk) 20:46, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- All dead links are fixed. bamse (talk) 20:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It seems that a few organizations decided to re-organize their websites with the start of the new fiscal year on April 1. Already fixed one link. It'll take some time to find the new location of the other pages since google is still pointing to the old locations. bamse (talk) 20:46, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The only thing I see which might be an issue on lower-resolution screens is the Statistics section with the tall left-aligned table next to the smaller right-aligned table and image. Should these maybe not be next to each, and instead placed above or below the left-aligned table? Other than that, I think everything looks very nice. I'm assuming the entries with a dash for the image are those for which we have no images? ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 10:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the feedback. I increased the size of the map a bit so that the space is filled better on my (small) screen. I now have a long and narrow table on the left, a small table on the top right and the map below it also right-aligned. It is virtually impossible to arrange the two tables and map in such a way that it looks good on all browsers and resolutions. I hope that it looks decent on most settings. Indeed, the entries with a dash don't have an image on wikipedia yet. There are only about
1110 (just added a picture of Kōjō-ji's pagoda) national treasure temple structures out of 152 without image which is quite remarkable. Except for the konjikidō where photography is not allowed, all structures can be photographed and will eventually have an image. bamse (talk) 12:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Support based on improvements made. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 08:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the feedback. I increased the size of the map a bit so that the space is filled better on my (small) screen. I now have a long and narrow table on the left, a small table on the top right and the map below it also right-aligned. It is virtually impossible to arrange the two tables and map in such a way that it looks good on all browsers and resolutions. I hope that it looks decent on most settings. Indeed, the entries with a dash don't have an image on wikipedia yet. There are only about
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 08:27, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 20:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for the comments. I started to address some point but will need another day or so for the rest. bamse (talk) 21:29, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from Jujutacular T · C 20:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comment Just one thing, what is the default sorting of the table? Jujutacular T · C 18:47, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support Jujutacular T · C 20:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.