Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Music Bank Chart winners (2022)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Music Bank Chart winners (2022) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): EN-Jungwon (talk) and Ladidadida123 (talk) 14:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is the eight article in this series that I am nominating for FL status. As always the list follows the same pattern as previous lists. This might be the last list of this series that I will be working on so any suggestions for improvement are welcome. -- EN-Jungwon 14:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "On February 25, KBS changed" - state the year for total clarity
- "Boy group NCT Dream also had three number one singles" => "Boy group NCT Dream also had three number-one singles" (when used as an adjective rather than a noun, "number one" has a hyphen)
- "The latter groups win" => "The latter group's win"
- "STAYC and Ateez gained their first number one on the chart" => "STAYC and Ateez gained their first number ones on the chart"
- "Both singles spent two weeks each on the chart." => "Both singles spent two weeks atop the chart"
- "The last first time winner on the chart" => "The last first-time winner on the chart"
- Think that's it - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude all done. Thanks for the review. -- EN-Jungwon 12:07, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey man im josh
- Support: As much as I've tried to find literally anything to critique, I've been unable to do so. Style is consistent with past articles in the series, accessibility compliant from what I can tell, and appears to meet all of the Featured list criteria. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review from MyCatIsAChonk
No spotcheck needed, I'll focus on formatting/reliability. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 14:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Unrelated, but add Template:Use American English or otherwise appropriate
- Cite error on ref 31
EN-Jungwon, I think that's it really. I have to AGF on the authors and dates since I cannot read Korean, but I trust it's all good since it seems like most general articles or the individual weeks are authorless. No questions on the reliability of the sources. Nice work! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 14:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @MyCatIsAChonk fixed. Thanks for the review. -- EN-Jungwon 17:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 17:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Image review – All of the photos used have appropriate free licenses and alt text. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:33, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:06, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.