Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Muni Metro stations

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 23:58, 3 February 2009 [1].

List of Muni Metro stations

My first FL nomination or maybe in a featured process of any sort. This is a continuation of the trend of bringing San Francisco Bay Area rail station lists here for FL consideration. —kur ykh 08:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support —Chris! _ct 19:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Chrishomingtang

I helped write this list and am satisfy with it, but I still have some comments.

9 subway stations -> nine subway stations
- Done. —kur ykh 06:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The opening year of Balboa Park Station needs a ref
- Done. Should the refs be shortened somehow? —kur ykh 01:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Consider adding more info about stations to the lead (eg. ridership in stations)
- I have looked far and wide, and this information isn't even available. There is ridership per line, but not per station. I will keep looking though. —kur ykh 06:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is more helpful to order the metro lines based on years open rather than alphabetically. And add a note to explain this similar to List of Bay Area Rapid Transit stations. (just ignore the first part if lines are already ordered based on years open)
- The problem is that unlike many other systems, Muni Metro line names have remained constant for the past century or so. The other articles seemed to have it sorted by years because of their names changing after every extension. Many descriptions regarding Muni Metro, formal or not, are done alphabetically, and it would be strange to do otherwise. —kur ykh 06:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ok—Chris! _ct 00:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

—Chris! _ct 19:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man on tour (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments - boy oh boy I love metro stuff. So, some comments, from overcast Cusco...
- Any reason that the Castro line is excluded from the map?
  - The official Muni Metro map that the list's map is based off of does not have the S Castro Shuttle line on it. —kur ykh 06:51, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- ¨...stops that consist from a traffic island or a sign painted on a telephone pole..." doesn´t read well to me..
  - Done. —kur ykh 06:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- BART should be explained before being used as an acronym.
  - Done. —kur ykh 06:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why is Castro stuff in italics?
  - Because the Castro line is a line with limited service.—Chris! _ct 21:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Fine, but forgive my ignorance, where is that stated in the key or in the text? The Rambling Man on tour (talk) 21:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - Added—Chris! _ct 22:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No need to superinflate the image sizes of the stations - i think you´re forcing the image sizes to 270px, no need.
  - Fixed by Chrishomingtang. —kur ykh 06:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Surface stations Platform col does not sort correctly.
  - Fixed by Chrishomingtang. —kur ykh 06:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good work, not too far off I reckon. The Rambling Man on tour (talk) 20:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support my concerns addressed, good work. The Rambling Man on tour (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow, Rambling man basically read the review in my mind :P. I have the same concerns raised by TRM, I can support once those are done because this is excellent, but those few problems.--TRUCO 22:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support - meets WP:WIAFL.--TRUCO 22:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk)

Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)

"Muni Metro is a light rail system serving San Francisco, California"-->Muni Metro is a light rail system that serves San Francisco, California.
- Done. —kur ykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Muni Metro serves 173,000 passengers a day, making it the second busiest in the United States" Secpnd-busiest what?
- Done. —kur ykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"The system consists of nine subway stations, 24 surface stations" Comparable quantities should be written the same way. Either make them both numerals or both written out.
- Done. —kur ykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Four ~~of the~~ stations"
- Done. —kur ykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The backgrounds should not cover the whole row, only the "Station" column. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:08, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, other similar FLs have backgrounds covering the entire row. Leaving this the exception would be strange. —kur ykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - So then, we change the others. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done. —kur ykh 19:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~On several refs, you spell out abbreviations, which is good, but you never actually use the abbreviations by themselves. I think that those parenthetical abbrevations should be removed.~~
- Done. —kur ykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Refs 1, 8 and 15 need format=PDF added to them.~~
- Done. —kur ykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~What makes http://world.nycsubway.org/us/sf/muni-streetcar.html a reliable source?~~
- Removed; other sources suffice. —kur ykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dabomb87 (talk) 17:08, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.