Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Major League Baseball player–managers/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 10:27, 16 May 2012 [1].
List of Major League Baseball player–managers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): – Muboshgu (talk) 18:54, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My last nomination appears to be set to pass. I only have one question about the presentation of this table: is it best to have each player-manager get one row, or should there be one row per tenure, even if that means some players are listed in multiple rows? – Muboshgu (talk) 18:54, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 13:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 12:05, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man (talk) 20:22, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 21:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- Support – Meets FL standards. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello Muboshgu, are you intending to address these remaining concerns? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:56, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, sorry. I've gotten busy with things at work. I hope to have these settled by tomorrow. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:00, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have resolved all of the above concerns. Now it's a matter of getting more reviewers. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:37, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello Muboshgu, are you intending to address these remaining concerns? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:56, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:36, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Prose comments, from Crisco 1492
|
- Support - Looks good. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:13, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Looks to me like it meets all 6 criteria. —Bloom6132 (talk) 06:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.