Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Local Nature Reserves in Surrey/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Local Nature Reserves in Surrey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 17:42, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is the latest in my nominations of lists of Local Nature Reserves and is in the same format as FLs such as Kent and Suffolk. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:42, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Looks great to me. Great job as always! Care to check out my new FLC? BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:17, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Looks good. A map might have been nice. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:04, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- Ashtead Park - "and...and..." should just be comma and one "and".
- "Fauna include the broad-bodied chaser and emperor dragonfly and the common blue damselfly." The and...and is because the chaser and emperor are both species of dragonfly. Would it work if I changed to "Fauna include the broad-bodied chaser and emperor dragonflies and the common blue damselfly." Dudley Miles (talk) 18:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- That works! Mattximus (talk) 02:59, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- "This site, which is managed by local volunteers, has grassland, a wildflower meadow, allotments, a butterfly garden and a community orchard where a local variety of apple, the Lingfield Forge is being grown." Could be two sentences (and a butterfly garden. A community orchard.... ) and then fix up the wording on the second sentence a bit, it might be missing a comma.
- Fixed. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- "The moth fauna is outstanding" is not very encyclopedic. Is there a better word?
- I am not clear what you think is wrong. Are you objecting to "fauna" or "outstanding"? Dudley Miles (talk) 18:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Outstanding sounded like a bitter of a hyperbole to me. Mattximus (talk) 02:58, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Mattximus how about "The moth fauna is described by Natural England as outstanding"? Dudley Miles (talk) 09:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Otherwise looks good to me, these are just 3 small quibbles, and I will thus Support preemptively. Mattximus (talk) 17:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Many thanks Mattximus. Replies above. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed, in keeping with the rest of the series, promoted. --PresN 21:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.