Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Inkigayo Chart winners (2016)/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Inkigayo Chart winners (2016) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): EN-Jungwon (talk) and Explicit (talk) 03:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is the second Inkigayo winners list. This list is based on the 2015 list which is a featured list. -- EN-Jungwon 03:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "Nine artists ranked more than one single on the chart in 2016" => "Nine artists had more than one number one in 2016"
- "The three groups went on to rank another single on the chart in 2016." => "The three groups all went on to have another number one in 2016."
- "Both groups ranked number one for six weeks each" => "Both groups ranked number one for six weeks"
- "I.O.I formed through the first season of the survival reality show Produce 101, achieved" => "I.O.I, formed through the first season of the survival reality show Produce 101, achieved" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:32, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude done. Thanks again. -- EN-Jungwon 12:06, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:57, 10 December 2023 (UTC)s[reply]
- Image review
- File:16.03.13 롯데몰 김포공항 여자친구 By.Holic 02.jpg has a broken source.
Otherwise, image placement, licence and ALT text are passable. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:36, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus the file has already been reviewed by a reviewer on commons, so is this still an issue? -- EN-Jungwon 14:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I think that the source link should work, so that folks can check whether it is accurate. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:08, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus I still feel like the whole point of an image review is to let people know that the image does have an acceptable license. I have gone ahead and changed the image to one with a live source. One more thing. I used imagmap for the images of groups to link to individual artists Wikipedia articles. Is this allowed/acceptable or is there a specific policy regarding this? Will this cause any accessibility issues? -- EN-Jungwon 11:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately I don't know much about accessibility issues. Perhaps ask at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility? I don't think there is a particular issue with the imagemap. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus I still feel like the whole point of an image review is to let people know that the image does have an acceptable license. I have gone ahead and changed the image to one with a live source. One more thing. I used imagmap for the images of groups to link to individual artists Wikipedia articles. Is this allowed/acceptable or is there a specific policy regarding this? Will this cause any accessibility issues? -- EN-Jungwon 11:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I think that the source link should work, so that folks can check whether it is accurate. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:08, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey man im josh
This has been waiting on a source review for a while so I'm giving it my best shot. Note that I used translated pages and assumed good faith on translations at times, given that I don't speak the language.
Source review: Passed
- Link checker shows no issues: Passed
Refs. 12 and 15 – Currently redirect to another link, please bypass these redirects
- Reliable enough for the information being cited: Passed
- Consistent date formatting: Passed
- Consistent and proper reference formatting: Passed
- I'm assuming good faith on a few authors, as they don't match up exactly when translated, but that's not unexpected when translating names.
Refs. 6, 12, 13 – Refer to the same website, make them consistent
- Appropriate wikilinks where applicable - Passed
Ref. 7 – Wikilink Sports Dong-a
- Spot checks on 10 sources match what they are being cited for: Passed (based on translations)
- Other comments:
- Is there any reason you use Naver instead of bypassing it to go to the source site when available? One example of this is ref. 8 which has a link in it to the source material. It's not a deal breaker by any means, but I'm curious.
Great stuff as always EN-Jungwon, I had to dig a bit to actually find things to critique. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hey man im josh, all done except wikilinking Herald POP. I think you had mixed up this list with the 2015 list. About using Naver; I mainly use it cause it loads faster and due to the lack of advertisements (sometimes they are a bit annoying). Using Naver has been discussed at Wikiproject Korea. The original source is preffered but using Naver is not strictly prohibited. Thanks for the quick review. -- EN-Jungwon 15:08, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- That's super strange that I caught Herald Pop from the other list, I did have it open for comparison, and commented on it here. The rest of my review seems to be applicable to this article, so just the one line I supposed. No problem about Naver, I can see it's rehosting the content and you have the proper via parameter filled in, so I'm not bothered there! Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 21:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.