Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ICC Champions Trophy five-wicket hauls/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 08:57, 22 November 2014 [1].

List of ICC Champions Trophy five-wicket hauls

Featured list candidates/List of ICC Champions Trophy five-wicket hauls/archive1

Nominator(s): —Vensatry _(ping) 13:41, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A cricket list based on List of Cricket World Cup five-wicket hauls, an existing FL. Look forward to your comments and suggestions —Vensatry _(ping) 13:41, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from — NickGibson3900 ^Talk

;Comments from NickGibson3900 ^Talk

"In cricket, a five-wicket haul (also known..." - Link five-wicket haul
Reference 2: Inconsistent date formatting with rest of article, publishing date is wrong it was published on 16th not the 17th
Key needs a note on what "result" means
Although not part of the criteria, please add {{International cricket five-wicket hauls}} to the article as this article is on that template

Very good article a will support once those minor quibbles have been fixed. Waiting for you at my nom - NickGibson3900 ^Talk 04:02, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed all. Thanks for your comments. I'll comment on your nom soon. —Vensatry _(ping) 05:59, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More comments from NickGibson3900 ^Talk

As ref 1 is the first ESPN ref it should link to ESPNcricinfo not ref 4

For the FLC delegates consider this a Support if my above comment has been addressed. Sorry Vensatry for the delay. - NickGibson3900 ^Talk 05:18, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks NickGibson3900 for your comments. —Vensatry _(ping) 17:27, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Another great cricket list by Vensatry - NickGibson3900 ^Talk 01:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from --Khadar Khani (talk) 23:49, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments—

I think the prose should be in past tense since the 2013 ICC Champions Trophy was the last edition of the tournament.
- Can you be a little more specific on what needs to be changed. —Vensatry _(ping) 08:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - For example ".. a total of 10 fifers have been taken by as many players." may be ... a total of 10 players took as many fifers. or else --Khadar Khani (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - I don't see a reason to change the tense when the ICC has not put an end to the tournament. —Vensatry _(ping) 11:45, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      - See this, this and this --Khadar Khani (talk) 12:44, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        See [2] and [3] —Vensatry _(ping) 17:59, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"...while Bangladesh, England and Zimbabwe are yet to see a player taking a fifer in the tournament." reword the sentence accordingly (per above)
- Per above —Vensatry _(ping) 08:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - By this statement you mean they still have chances to take fifers in the tournament?! --Khadar Khani (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yes, why not? —Vensatry _(ping) 11:45, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      - Per above. --Khadar Khani (talk) 12:44, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Add a little more about Maharoof's bowling figures
- Apart from the fact that this is the best analysis by a bowler in the tournament's history, I don't find any special about the same. —Vensatry _(ping) 08:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Have a look at this and this!? --Khadar Khani (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - Added —Vensatry _(ping) 11:45, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No need of 'doing so' in the last sentence

--Khadar Khani (talk) 03:02, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's redundant. Is it? —Vensatry _(ping) 08:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I still think this is redundant, the statement is clearly understandable without this. --Khadar Khani (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done —Vensatry _(ping) 11:45, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Link 'ICC Champions Trophy' at first use. --Khadar Khani (talk) 12:44, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
link runs. --Khadar Khani (talk) 12:44, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Both done —Vensatry _(ping) 17:59, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support – meets the standards. Good work! --Khadar Khani (talk) 23:49, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"in the ICC Champions Trophy tournaments" not sure you need "the" here.
- Done —Vensatry _(ping) 19:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"a fifer in the ICC Champions Trophy tournaments. The ICC Champions Trophy" repetitive.
- Since I jumped into explaining the meaning of a fifer before the tournament, I have to repeat the tournament's name while defining it. —Vensatry _(ping) 19:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
" is considered the second most significant" you use a single source for this claim, could so arguably just the opinion of one writer.
- Done —Vensatry _(ping) 19:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"As of 2013, the latest edition," why not "As of the 2013 tournament, ..."?
- Done —Vensatry _(ping) 19:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"a total of 10 fifers have" you've said this already in the previous para.
- Done —Vensatry _(ping) 19:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I would avoid "edition" altogether when referring to a specific tournament, why not just mention "the xxxx tournament" (where xxxx is a year)?
- Done —Vensatry _(ping) 19:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
" to take a fifer; he took 5 " take ... took... repetitive prose.
- Done —Vensatry _(ping) 19:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Econ should be given to the same accuracy.
- Done —Vensatry _(ping) 19:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Younis Khan should be Younus Khan apparently.
- Done —Vensatry _(ping) 19:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 20:59, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Well-referenced list and it meets the FLC criteria. --Carioca (talk) 20:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:51, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.