Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Gillingham F.C. players (25–49 appearances)/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Gillingham F.C. players (25–49 appearances)

Featured list candidates/List of Gillingham F.C. players (25–49 appearances)/archive1

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another football club player list up for FL. I based it on List of Arsenal F.C. players (25–99 appearances) which was promoted quite recently, so hopefully it is up to the currently-expected standard -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Good read, although is odd to have a list from 25 to 49, if the main list starts at 50, this one should have all the remaining players, but it's your choice.--Threeohsix (talk) 12:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen the size of the 1-24 list? It's absolutely huge (well over 100K), so combining it with this one would create a monster! Also, splitting the overall list into 3 articles is quite standard for football club lists of this type......... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Lemonade51 (talk) 21:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments – minor stuff

'The Football League' should link to 'English Football League'
- Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Table needs rowscopes, per MOS:DTT
- Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:22, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Images could do with WP:ALT
- Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 9 should be 'BBC Sport'
- Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:14, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ISBN for 'Gillingham Football Club: A Chronology 1893–1984'?
- It doesn't have one -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Statistics are correct up to the end of the 2015–16 season," they have played two games into the new season, has this affected the list? If so, date needs changing. Lemonade51 (talk) 22:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- No, the stats are still correct to the end of last season. I don't update them after every single game. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:08, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support – on style, satisfies the criteria. Lemonade51 (talk) 21:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support The only issue I have is that maybe the position column should sort by position. So, goalkeeper is first with forward last, but that's the only quibble I have. Great work. NapHit (talk) 22:09, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Passing source review, with some minor changes. Consider archiving your online sources, so that if e.g. Soccerbase goes away this list doesn't get taken out. Closing this nomination as promoted. --Pres N 16:02, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.