Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Family Guy cast members/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Juliancolton 04:35, 29 November 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): Pedro J. the rookie 15:09, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this for featured list because i think that it can be an FL. Pedro J. the rookie 15:09, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments, just real quick:
- WP:AVOID using "However". If not, you shouldn't use it to start a sentence.
- I don't think this list is complete. Mila Kunis was nominated for an award for her work in this show
- Do not now, will find out--Pedro J. the rookie 20:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Kunis was nominated for an Annie Award for her voice work on the episode "Barely Legal". Gage (talk) 01:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- done
- And that's the only one I know of. Obviously the subject hasn't been researched well enough because the nominator himself admitted he did not know. I am very reticent to support something that may not be complete, but we can't be sure because nobody knows. Matthewedwards : Chat 02:34, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have looked for the info of thease artical and i think it is very much done.--Pedro J. the rookie 02:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- After reviewing the article, I added one more award to the section, and was not able to find any others to add to the list. It should be complete now. Gage (talk) 03:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What does the grey boxes mean? It needs to comply with WP:COLOR, and at the moment I don't think it does.
- the grey boxes sepertate the voice characters.--Pedro J. the rookie 20:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- done
Cheers, Matthewedwards : Chat 04:24, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Another comment
- Your edit links are bunched up. Matthewedwards : Chat 02:31, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry for that.--Pedro J. the rookie 02:35, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, but they're still WP:BUNCHed. Matthewedwards : Chat 03:51, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Is it better now.--Pedro J. the rookie 14:27, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Geraldk
|
|---|
|
into 2 sentences or fix the punctuation and transition
done i put refrences on most of the cast exept the normal which has already refrenced.--Pedro J. the rookie 03:04, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
will be working on that.--Pedro J. the rookie 18:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply] Is that better.--Pedro J. the rookie 21:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Dabs; please check the disambiguation links identified in the toolbox. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - After a thorough copyedit by User:Scapler, article seems to meet the FL criteria. Gage (talk) 00:24, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll support, but for the long-term benefit of the list, it would probably be good to fill out the character list so every character has an entry, and may be linked to. Geraldk (talk) 00:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll put it in the todo list and on the WP:FG things you can do, thanks for the review.--Pedro J. the rookie 00:40, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- A few sourcing issues:
- Several unsourced statements in the "Casting changes" section. For example: "It is mentioned in the DVD commentary track that Alazraqui was reluctant to leave the Family Guy series", which commentary?
- done--Pedro J. the rookie 18:58, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The citations seem to be rather random. In some cases they are after the actor, in others after the characters ir statements. Other rows do not have any citations.
- In the row for Butch Hartman, why not give a few examples of characters he has voiced. Also, I'm assuming the first word in "Started in many episodes as various characters" is a typo.
- Done and no there are no examples--Pedro J. the rookie 19:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "Regular Cast": "Family Guy has five main cast members, most of whom play several roles on the show." That is a little confusing, because six people are listed below. Why not change it to "At any point in its history, Family Guy has had five main cast members ... "
- What is with the italicized names in the tables?
- Those are names that do not have links in the character list(it is quite a mess), discused with previous editor.--Pedro J. the rookie 19:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps you should add a note that explains it then.
- A note?, how?--Pedro J. the rookie 00:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Removed to many trobule.--Pedro J. the rookie 18:37, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Those are names that do not have links in the character list(it is quite a mess), discused with previous editor.--Pedro J. the rookie 19:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why not change the first section to "current cast", and remove everything about Lacey Chabert to the casting changes section?
- Also, perhaps the voice credits for the main cast should be listed to regular characters, and exclude one-timers and impressions.
- can you be a bit spesific, and there are no onetimers in the list made sure of that.--Pedro J. the rookie 19:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What about Mickey McFinnigan or OBrian? It might also be best to exclude characters from other sources (ie. the Kool Aid Man) or impressions (ie. Dick Cheney) and keep it to Family Guy characters.
- Done--Pedro J. the rookie 00:20, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- can you be a bit spesific, and there are no onetimers in the list made sure of that.--Pedro J. the rookie 19:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In "Casting changes", if Norm MacDonald voiced Death in one episode, wouldn't that make him a guest star rather than a cast member?
- no he was going to continue but could not the one who plays death now is a recurring cast member.--Pedro J. the rookie 19:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In "Recurring cast", isn't it confusing to mention names in prose that are in other sections.
- Can you explain?.--Pedro J. the rookie 19:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In that section, people like Lori Alan are mentioned in the prose, but not in the table. At first, I was confused as to why they were not mentioned, then I saw they were in the next section. It might be best to only mention people in their relevant section.
- Done--Pedro J. the rookie 00:20, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you explain?.--Pedro J. the rookie 19:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If memory serves (and I might be completely wrong), but doesn't Family Guy not make any distinction between regular and guest cast in the credits? If so, how did you decide who goes where.
- I did that in the way that the recurring is the one who apperes but not so offten, the guest is the one who apperes many times but in diffrent episodes of seasons, did you you understand or iam i confusing you?.--Pedro J. the rookie 19:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it makes sense. Perhaps you should add a note in the article?
- Done note in posicion.--Pedro J. the rookie 18:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I did that in the way that the recurring is the one who apperes but not so offten, the guest is the one who apperes many times but in diffrent episodes of seasons, did you you understand or iam i confusing you?.--Pedro J. the rookie 19:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the list needs a much better definition of what qualifies someone as a "recurring guest star". For example, Drew Barrymore guest starred in a number of episodes but is not listed.
- Done and will expand.--Pedro J. the rookie 19:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In "recurring voices", a lot of notes could use copyediting, ie. "Guest starred in some episodes from 2001 to 2008" seems rather (for lack of a better term) lazy. Also in that section, some notes have periods while others do not.
- A few sourcing issues:
- It's a pretty good start, but I think the list still has a ways to go. -- Scorpion0422 02:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review and looks like you do now a bit FG.--Pedro J. the rookie 19:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I did like the show until the post-cancellation seasons started, now I could care less about it. I still catch the occasional new episode. -- Scorpion0422 23:41, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Flash
|
|---|
|
- Support: My issues have been taken care of and I believe this passes FL criteria. The Flash {talk} 01:08, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
| Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 15:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
|---|
Oppose - some basic issues I'm afraid....
The Rambling Man (talk) 19:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply] More comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 09:16, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
- Comment I won't oppose, the work done has been excellent so far, but I'm finding it difficult to agree this is our "finest work". Good luck. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- TRM makeing the artical better is the important thing, hit me with some improveing comments.--Pedro J. the rookie 18:37, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
–Juliancolton | Talk 04:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.