Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Derbyshire County Cricket Club grounds/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by SchroCat 10:11, 7 August 2015 [1].
List of Derbyshire County Cricket Club grounds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude, AssociateAffiliate
AssociateAffiliate started this article and created the table, I have added an extensive lead and generally tweaked it a bit, and now feel it meets the FL requirements. I have an open FLC for List of Warwickshire County Cricket Club grounds, but that has two supports and no unresolved comments. All changes in response to user comments on that FLC have been incorporated into this article too -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:19, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from —Vensatry (ping)
Burton upon Trent – Linked twice in lede- Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"List A cricket since 1963[2]" – Move the ref to the end of the sentence.- Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- You say "The club was established on 4 November 1870 and has played" but in another sentence say "Derbyshire have played first class".
- Sorted (hopefully) - in British English it is standard to use the singular when referring to the club as an off-the-field organisation, but plural when referring to the team of actual players on the field. Hope that makes sense...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the clarification! —Vensatry (ping) 19:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorted (hopefully) - in British English it is standard to use the singular when referring to the club as an off-the-field organisation, but plural when referring to the team of actual players on the field. Hope that makes sense...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The last sentence of the opening para must be sourced.- I would have thought it was self-evident from looking at the dates in the table...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- To be more precise, I was referring to the last two parts of it. Also, the "Notes" section is currently unsourced. —Vensatry (ping) 19:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I still don't follow. DO you refer to the bit that says "....Highfield in Leek, which in 2013 hosted the most recent Derbyshire home game not to be played in either Derby or Chesterfield."? Well, that can be deduced by looking at the dates in the table, I don't think it needs separate sourcing...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:33, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Notes are now sourced -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- "all of which are not actually located in Derbyshire, but in the adjoining county of Staffordshire." —Vensatry (ping) 06:41, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, sorry, opening paragraph - d'oh! For some reason I kept reading it as if you were talking about the whole lead. Ref added..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- "all of which are not actually located in Derbyshire, but in the adjoining county of Staffordshire." —Vensatry (ping) 06:41, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Notes are now sourced -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I still don't follow. DO you refer to the bit that says "....Highfield in Leek, which in 2013 hosted the most recent Derbyshire home game not to be played in either Derby or Chesterfield."? Well, that can be deduced by looking at the dates in the table, I don't think it needs separate sourcing...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:33, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- To be more precise, I was referring to the last two parts of it. Also, the "Notes" section is currently unsourced. —Vensatry (ping) 19:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I would have thought it was self-evident from looking at the dates in the table...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why is Biddulph piped to Knypersley? Also, I cannot find Burton upon Trent in the source. Does it have a different name? Lastly, Leek links to the vegetable. —Vensatry (ping) 07:45, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The map in the source shows Burton as being in Staffordshire, but just to be on the safe side I've put in another ref too. Knypersley is part of Biddulph and does not have a separate WP article. Leek link fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:25, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Debut first-class cricket since 1871 is repeated twice in lede.- Sorted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The table needs row and column scopes.- Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
—Vensatry (ping) 19:13, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Nice work! —Vensatry (ping) 10:29, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support No major issues leap out at me. Great work. NapHit (talk) 19:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Harrias and The Rambling Man: Can you have a look at this candidate? This shouldn't be closed due to lack of reviews. —Vensatry (ping) 07:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Looks good to me. A couple of wrapping issues in the table I'd prefer to see fixed ("v Nottinghamshire" splits onto two lines on my browser for the Twenty20 column), but nothing major. Harrias talk 08:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Late to the party, but confidently supporting. Plainly meets the FL criteria. I am obliged to The Rambling Man for shaking the bucket for this benefit, which I'd otherwise have missed. This is good work, and I'm happy to support. Off now to look at Warwickshire. Tim riley talk 21:57, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 10:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.