Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Delhi Daredevils cricketers/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Delhi Daredevils cricketers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/List of Delhi Daredevils cricketers/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of Delhi Daredevils cricketers/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Bharatiya29 10:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because it is a former FL which was demoted because of the fact that it was highly outdated. However, that is not the case now and I believe that the list should again be promoted to FL status. Bharatiya29 10:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - "The second list includes all those players who were brought by DD but they did not play any match. They are also initially listed alphabetically by their last name" - I can't see any such table...? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:55, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- Fix these links.
- Done
- Is "CricketArchive" a RS?
- It is used as a source in many featured cricket lists and articles. I don't see any reason to not consider it a RS.
- I would suggest you to delink Delhi in the opening sentence, per WP:OLINK.
Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:17, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support this nomination. Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from TompaDompa (talk) 16:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*"Delhi Daredevils (DD) is a franchise" – seems to me like this should start with "The", just like the main Delhi Daredevils article. Done
TompaDompa (talk) 01:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support Great job. TompaDompa (talk) 16:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - all looks OK to me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 13:31, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
Enough for a quick run through. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 02:55, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.