Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Cincinnati Bengals first-round draft picks/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of Cincinnati Bengals first-round draft picks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Nominator(s): Debartolo2917 (talk) 20:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for similar reasons as a prior nomination for List of Chicago Bears first-round draft picks. This page has undergone substantial renovation recently, fixing links, removing redundant characters, and generally updating it to modern list formats. It now aligns with other nominated first-round NFL draft pick lists. As many other NFL team lists are featured lists, it makes sense that once non-featured lists are fixed to meet featured criteria, they too should be featured. Debartolo2917 (talk) 20:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments
  • There are five people in the photo, the caption should make clear which one is Munoz
  • "The Cincinnati Bengals are a National Football League (NFL) franchise founded as an expansion team of the American Football League in 1968. " - source?
  • "They joined the National Football League as a result of the 1970 AFL–NFL merger. " - source?
  • The whole second paragraph of the lead is unsourced
  • The captions of all three images beside the table are complete sentences so need full stops
  • Some of the notes refer to something called an All-Pro. There's no indication of what this is - is there an appropriate wikilink?
  • Note 10 needs a full stop
  • There are no inline references in the article at all, just a massive dump of references at the bottom with no indication of what each reference is sourcing. Per WP:IC, featured content requires inline citations -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Further comment
  • BTW I just noticed that you are also the nominator of the similar Chicago Bears article below. The instructions at the top of the FLC page say "Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed". On that basis, you should withdraw one of the noms until the other one gains substantial support....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]