Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Bleach chapters

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 23:40, 28 February 2009 [1].

List of Bleach chapters

Nominator(s): Tintor2 (talk)

Featured list candidates/List of Bleach chapters/archive1

I am renominating this for featured list after it had all its issues fixed from the previous nomination. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 03:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Truco

Comments from Truco (talk · contribs)

Lead

In Japan, they are published in Shueisha's Weekly Shōnen Jump since 2001. -- They are should be 'they have been'.
He also encounters former Soul Reaper Sōsuke Aizen who created an army of powerful hollow called arrancar to destroy the Soul Reapers' organization, Soul Society. -- Comma before who
An anime adaptation, produced by Studio Pierrot and TV Tokyo and airing on TV Tokyo, premiered on October 5, 2004. -- Reword to An airing of a anime adaptation, produced by Studio Pierrot and TV Tokyo, premiered on TV Tokyo on October 5, 2004.
Viz Media released the first volume on June 1, 2004, as of December 2008 twenty-five volumes have been released. -- Comma should be a semi-colon not a comma.

List

From my standpoint the listings seem fine, but I would seek a copyedit of the summaries of the chapters. But first of all, where are these based from?--TRU CO 02:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Done the lead fixes. The summaries are based on the volumes. Is there any notable grammar issue?Tintor2 (talk) 10:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, where do they come from. Are they reworded statements from another website? I'm not sure, but its a lot of content and a copyedit would be nice, just in case.TRU CO 21:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, they were made based on the volumes. If not they would be breaking copyvio.Tintor2 (talk) 22:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oh okay, then. Due to that, it is best to seek a good copyedit of them. For now I will~~ ~~Weak~~ Support this nomination (since it meets the ~~rest of the~~ WP:WIAFL criteria) ~~until a thorough copyedit is done.~~--TRU CO 22:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Goodraise

Resolved comments:

Romaji titles need title-casing.
"048. Menos Grande (メノスグランデ Menosugurande)" - No need to give romaji in this case.
Ref 2 misuses the "title" parameter. Either give the chapter name or use the "chapter" parameter.
Ref 61 needs a publisher.

-- Goodraise (talk) 21:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Tintor2 (talk) 22:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Ore-sama no na wa Ganju" -> "Ore-sama no Na wa Ganju"
"Renshūkyoku Op.1" -> "Renshūkyoku op.1"
"Hitori - ō no Kodoku" -> "Hitori - Ō no Kodoku"
Link the publisher in ref. 59 and 61.

-- Goodraise (talk) 22:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Tintor2 (talk) 22:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support, until a prose expert says it meets 1.a. -- Goodraise (talk) 22:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Meets the featured list criteria. -- Goodraise (talk) 01:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note I have done two complete copy-edits (summaries only), one here and another here, after the summaries were expanded. ~~I will repeat that I did not look at the lead.~~ Dabomb87 (talk) 22:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did some light touching up of the lead, nothing major. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Generally good, ~~but can you find reliable sources to replace current refs 1 & 3.~~ The encyclopedia section of ANN is editable by anyone, and therefore is not reliable. (NB. I have found mistakes with it recently). Rambo's Revenge (talk) 10:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- For ref 1, another source I found was this. Any idea of what source could be used for ref 3?Tintor2 (talk) 19:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Something like that TV Tokyo Archive --KrebMarkt 19:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done. Thanks.Tintor2 (talk) 19:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - Sourcing is now fine, apologies I don't have time to give a full review. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 15:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.