I see that there are good lists of the astronauts in Project Apollo already - perhaps some of that information should be moved across? That article also explains that there was no Apollo 2 or 3, and 4 to 6 were unmanned. Perhaps this could be added too. -- ALoan(Talk)16:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think we need to mention those because this is a list of astronauts, not of missions. Do we really think that having everyone listed four times would be an improvement (alphabetical, chronological, by astronaut selection group, by accomplishment)? Tianxiaozhang asked on my talk page whether backup astronauts and the the Apollo-Soyuz Program astronauts should be added. I would say that the Skylab and Apollo-Soyuz flights were not part of Project Apollo although they used leftover equipment. I did find three backup crew who didn't fly on an Apollo flight and have added them. Rmhermen16:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A few lists introduce the content in a couple different ways (the most recent example I can think of is List of European Union member states by political system). Personally I think the listing by mission is the most intuitive way to go, with the other method you already used being a nice complement. Also, if you're not including Apollo-Soyuz astronauts you should give an explanation of why somewhere in the article. -- RuneWelsh | ταλκ13:08, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There's no single mention of "Appolo" in the lead. For the readers who don't know what Appolo Project is, the lead does not establish the context and defines the title. Could you reword it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cedar-Guardian (talk • contribs) .
