Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Liliʻuokalani's Cabinet Ministers/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:13:07 5 January 2020 (UTC) [1].
Liliʻuokalani's Cabinet Ministers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): User:Maile66 and KAVEBEAR (talk) 00:26, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because it is a quality list and well researched and referenced and list all key politicians in the executive cabinet during the reign of Hawaii’s last queen Liliʻuokalani. KAVEBEAR (talk) 00:26, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The table should be sortable so each type of minister could be viewed together.
- Gulick and Parker have inconsistent use of (acting)
- Mott-Smith's description doesn't need a comma
- Inconsistent use of abbreviations for months in descriptions
- Holdover is not hyphenated
- Optional since this isn't a huge table, but references don't need their own column, can go in the notes. Would allow for a separate sortable column for dates.
- I see you also wrote the articles on the positions themselves: the three are titled as Ministry but the subject and bolded first mention are about the Minister – I'd suggest moving the page to that since they're not actually about the government department
- Do not link to a WP: page in the see also, a reader does not need to read our manual of style from this page...
- I'm wondering if this should be renamed Cabinet of Liliʻuokalani to be more consistent with e.g. Cabinet of Donald Trump. This list has primacy on the individuals rather than the positions, which could make more sense, grouping together those who served in the same position rather than just alphabetical order. The lead focuses on the government timeline and formations/dissolutions rather than the people themselves.
Very nice topic overall. Reywas92Talk 21:37, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@KAVEBEAR: I am no longer interested in putting this through FLC. Could we please just withdraw this? — Maile (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Requesting withdrawal. Co-nominator has expressed they don’t want to proceed.KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:04, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:13, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.