Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Leicestershire and Rutland Wildlife Trust/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Leicestershire and Rutland Wildlife Trust

Featured list candidates/Leicestershire and Rutland Wildlife Trust/archive1

Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 22:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the latest in my nominations of wildlife trusts. It follows the format of FLs such as Essex Wildlife Trust and the Suffolk Wildlife Trust, and I believe that it also meets the criteria. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 23:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

;Comments from BeatlesLedTV

In lead, write out numbers below nine per MOS:NUM (& nineteen as well for consistency)

This is complicated. My understanding is that consistency overrides letters for numbers below ten, and if there are both numbers above and below I can use numbers or letters throughout. However, a sentence should not start with a figure, and as I have a sentence starting with 19, I have changed them all to letters as you suggest. Dudley Miles (talk) 11:53, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the period after ref 53

Changed. Dudley Miles (talk) 11:53, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry's Meadows has "There are several ponds." I would change it to "The meadow also has several ponds" so it doesn't sound as blunt.

Changed to "There are four ponds with common and great crested newts." OK?

That's all I got. Great job as always! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 01:33, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Dudley Miles (talk) 11:53, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support – All good for me. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 23:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"it has over 16,000 members," I thought I mentioned this a few reviews back, but if not, apologies. Need to describe what "members" means here. I.e. people that can visit for free? People who make voluntary contributions for nothing back?

Added note. (I am not convinced it is needed but it is additional information.) Dudley Miles (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"nd to inspire people to assist in this work." sounds like a quote, certainly not encyclopedic in tone.

Deleted. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You linked Leicestershire in the first para, no need to do it again in the second.

Done. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Link "county town".

Done. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't overlink the 2011 census.

Done. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 23 (for example), keep all ref date formats the same.

Done. (I see I missed several on my previous check.) Dudley Miles (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 21:33, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review The Rambling Man. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support had a quick last look, happy with this. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Courcelles (talk) 18:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*"across the UK." Spell out United Kingdom on first usage

Done. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"500 volunteeers." Typo

Fixed. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"and is managed by an elected Council of Trustees." Elected by whom?

Specified by members. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For public access, do we really need "YES" to be in all-caps?

No, but it has been done that way in other wildlife trust lists, and I prefer to keep to a consistent format. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise, looks good. Courcelles (talk) 17:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Courcelles (talk) 18:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting --Pres N 04:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.