Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Jennifer Aniston filmography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 13 April 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Jennifer Aniston filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 18:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jennifer Aniston is mostly known as the 'Rachel'. She has appeared in many films, telefilms, video games, etc. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 18:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments about the title. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Drive-by comment - there are several films, etc, listed which she directed/produced but did not (as far as I can see) appear in. These are not performances so should not be included -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments by LuK3
That's it from me for now, great work on the list! -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:50, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support, thank you for addressing. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:37, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments
|
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:37, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from User:SNUGGUMS
|
---|
We should be set after my above concerns are resolved. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:52, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
|
I can now support following sufficient improvements. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. For a media review, I don't see any licensing problems with File:Jennifer Aniston 2011 (cropped).jpg. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Source review –
- What makes Apple Insider (ref 31) a reliable source? It looks more like a rumor mill than a reliable news source, and I'd think a SAG award wouldn't be hard to find something better for.
- All caps in the title of ref 19 should be removed.
- Other than those issues, the formatting and reliability of the sourcing look okay. The link-checker tool shows no concerns. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Giants2008: All done. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:55, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.