Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/James Blunt discography/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 14 days, 4 support, 0 oppose. Promote. Scorpion0422 22:24, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a list of official releases and music videos by British pop singer James Blunt. It is well referenced and complete. -- Underneath-it-All 01:31, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The lead seems to contradict itself by saying has has released one studio album and then discussing his second.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 21:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed it. Thanks for pointing it out. -- Underneath-it-All 21:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Few issues here:
- "Unreleased songs that were written or recorded by Blunt are also included." should be removed from the lead.
- The dashes (-) that represent an album not charting on a particular chart should be em dashes (—).
- ""—" denotes albums that were released but did not chart." should be added to the end of the Albums section.
- The sales figure for Chasing Time: The Bedlam Sessions is missing a reference.
- The seventh footnote cites Wikipedia, which is against policy. References should be from reliable external sources.
- All chart positions need references.
- The ninth footnote needs to be formatted properly, and should link to the article within the website that gives the information it is citing.
- Each song in the "Miscellaneous" section should have a reference.
If these issues are resolved I'll support.--Brandt Luke Zorn 18:34, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Looks good. --Brandt Luke Zorn 13:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment "RIAA certification: 2× platinum (2.6 million)" Where does the 2.6 million come from? The link only specifies the certification. Teemu08 19:37, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- All of this has been reverted back to a previous edit which cited all references and was properly formatted. -- Underneath-it-All 20:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, the charts are cited in the reference section. It's the same as other FL. -- Underneath-it-All 22:13, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- All of this has been reverted back to a previous edit which cited all references and was properly formatted. -- Underneath-it-All 20:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant oppose I wanted to say "conditional support", until I noticed the charting albums issue.Given that both Back to Bedlam and All the Lost Souls charted in many countries, a chart should be added for the album table.I think the catalog numbers are good additions (though their use has been irregular in discographies)Consider replacing "producers" with "format" (more standard for featured discographies, although not fully consistent, and would gain room for the charts).The use of the dash for "No Bravery"? Needs to be revised.The Switzerland source needs proper formatting (probably added by someone else)
- Circeus 18:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added charts for the albums and corrected a few minor mistakes that had been added by unregistered editors. -- Underneath-it-All 21:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Great responsiveness. I trimmed a few charts so the album table doesn't look too contrived at 1024x800 (though 800x600 is a lost cause...). Circeus 02:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added charts for the albums and corrected a few minor mistakes that had been added by unregistered editors. -- Underneath-it-All 21:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Looks good. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]